Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,455 posts)
18. You don't know that is what the assignment was.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:35 PM
Sep 2012

Here is the teacher's version of what the assignment was:

El Paso Independent School District officials said they spoke to the teacher, who said the terrorist attacks were part of class discussion, and students were asked to draw something they learned in the discussion.


Because the images of desperate victims leaping to their deaths are part of what appears in public near 9/11 (I ran across that particular image at least twice), I don't know that the child was even exposed to that detail as part of the class discussion.

Like I said elsewhere in this thread, before I condemn the teacher for the lesson and/or assignment, I want more than the parent's recitation of the child's interpretation of the assignment. And, I want it from a news source other than FOX news.

IF the discussion exposed the children to people jumping to their deaths that may have been inappropriate. I would prefer decisions about that level of detail of exposure, at least in visual form, be left to the parents. That said, I was around no more than a year older when my pretty conservative school exposed me to my first graphic pictures of the holocaust and, while I found them shocking, I don't find that exposure inappropriate.

If the teacher specifically required them to draw people leaping to their death, that was inappropriate.

If, on the other hand, the child drew those images because that is what she learned from the discussion, or learned from the images she has seen every year since her birth, it is not inappropriate for her to use the assignment to express that learning.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is not age appropriate. ananda Sep 2012 #1
Definitely not! GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #2
it's not appropriate, period.. frylock Sep 2012 #17
Good for the teacher. CanSocDem Sep 2012 #3
Those kids weren't even born then. Indpndnt Sep 2012 #4
that's sick. seriously. these are little kids. cali Sep 2012 #6
Excuse me?! Instructing 9-yr-olds to draw desperate victims leaping to their deaths is "good"?!?!?! WinkyDink Sep 2012 #8
You don't know that is what the assignment was. Ms. Toad Sep 2012 #18
I'd like to see the actual instructions Ms. Toad Sep 2012 #5
Really? NINE-year-olds, born in 2003, were supposed to have "learned" from 9/11/01?? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #9
The assignment followed a class discussion on 9/11. Ms. Toad Sep 2012 #15
I did a diorama of the attack on Pearl Harbor LibertyLover Sep 2012 #23
Agreed. jp11 Sep 2012 #13
Bad Teacher marions ghost Sep 2012 #7
I guess this should bother me more than it does. I don't think it's a TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #10
wow, it blows my mind that some people actually think that was an OK assignment phantom power Sep 2012 #11
yes, but we must indoctrinate an entire generation of kids that don't know how to fear.. frylock Sep 2012 #19
That would be great for an undergraduate drawing class slackmaster Sep 2012 #12
I have to admit to being a bit suspicious since this is a FOX story gollygee Sep 2012 #14
it's a local affiliate. not the same thing. cali Sep 2012 #21
Crazy thing is that these kids were not even born when 9/11 happened. I think some people take the Erose999 Sep 2012 #16
yep frylock Sep 2012 #20
The principal at the school I was at on Tuesday even pointed that out. Jennicut Sep 2012 #22
I'm a bit mystified by the "age appropriate" stuff in this thread alcibiades_mystery Sep 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Teacher assigns 4th grade...»Reply #18