Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Simplistic Question ... [View all]
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
5. Quite correct ...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:30 PM
Sep 2012

But I am not so much looking at this on a legal basis; but rather, from a media framing perspective and wondering does the (in my view, intentionally) inflamatory language, in light of the known facts, matter?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Simplistic Question ... [View all] 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 OP
What are your feelings jdlh8894 Sep 2012 #1
Let me make the distinction through an anaology ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #4
Weren't the mortars jdlh8894 Sep 2012 #7
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #11
If the "hooligans" were protesting by murdering.... MNBrewer Sep 2012 #22
I think it would matter... kentuck Sep 2012 #2
Don't know what legal system they have but intent to kill treestar Sep 2012 #3
Quite correct ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #5
"inflamatory language"? I'm not watching TV on this so maybe I'm not seeing what you're seeing MNBrewer Sep 2012 #23
"Murdered" ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #27
Ok, well, i'm gonna go ahead here and disagree. MNBrewer Sep 2012 #28
Probably not treestar Sep 2012 #10
That's my point ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #14
...and there's also a lot of "inflaming" going on right here on DU. L0oniX Sep 2012 #6
"died from smoke inhalation" = "killed" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #8
Again ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #12
Legal distinction there Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #15
Objection, Your Honor ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #18
Links? in order to put the facts in evidence? MNBrewer Sep 2012 #24
Simplistic Answer... brooklynite Sep 2012 #9
If someone sets fire to a crowded theater, are the people who die of smoke inhalation less dead MNBrewer Sep 2012 #13
One sets fire to a theater ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #16
What if setting the fire is part of the protest MNBrewer Sep 2012 #17
All reports ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #19
How do you propose to separate the supposedly legitimate protestors from those who MNBrewer Sep 2012 #21
That's true ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #25
So what's the utility in making the distinction ? MNBrewer Sep 2012 #26
If the facts are, as they appear to by ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #29
I think the breaching of our embassy/consulate walls is grounds enough for outrage MNBrewer Sep 2012 #30
Please give the family our condolences for his work. NotThisTime Sep 2012 #20
My first reaction yesterday Joe Shlabotnik Sep 2012 #31
I know ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Simplistic Question ...»Reply #5