Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They have mathematical models and feed data into them, and get the answers Steelrolled Apr 2020 #1
I'd say 2. They have no idea how people are going to act bullimiami Apr 2020 #6
You are right... assumption on how people conform to Laura PourMeADrink May 2020 #42
We'll Call It A 1.2 ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #7
What counts is Excess Deaths, not lies like Florida under-count by policy. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #12
Some States Are Better Than Others ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #20
The lower value of their range is 59,343 muriel_volestrangler May 2020 #46
Reinforces My Point ProfessorGAC May 2020 #48
The models are crapshoots Is that one still current? gibraltar72 Apr 2020 #2
Link is as of today. nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #3
I wonder if they were modeling social distancing. I've seen various scenarios. We're going gibraltar72 Apr 2020 #5
LOL, both of us!! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #8
They Moved It Up Because Of Early Reopenings ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #9
We'll be lucky if there aren't 30,000 more deaths in May alone greenjar_01 Apr 2020 #14
No Argument From Me ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #18
They didn't check the "insane President" box in the settings rickford66 Apr 2020 #4
Yep. Blue_true Apr 2020 #34
yes NewJeffCT May 2020 #37
+1, it even that has multiple levels uponit7771 May 2020 #43
it's a prediction and nothing more than that beachbumbob Apr 2020 #10
Good grief, that projection is clearly wrong! Buckeye_Democrat Apr 2020 #11
We'll be over 75,000 by the end of next week greenjar_01 Apr 2020 #13
There will be over 70,000 by next week this time n/t malaise Apr 2020 #15
I agree! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #16
Here's another model ramblin_dave Apr 2020 #17
Thanks for the link! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #19
1.1 MILLION DEAD without current interventions? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2020 #22
I'm in Iowa. IHME model says 300 dead. This one suggests 10,000+. Someone is going to bullwinkle428 Apr 2020 #31
Their model may be assuming stay home restrictions remain in effect and are followed nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2020 #21
something to consider about model predictions mike_c Apr 2020 #23
Interesting! Thanks for the info! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #24
We will reach that number before May 15. MineralMan Apr 2020 #25
The IHME model is crap. Always has been, always will be. Epidemiologists are on Squinch Apr 2020 #26
A week ago they were predicting 60,000 deaths by that date. Crunchy Frog Apr 2020 #27
Next week they'll "revise" it again D_Master81 Apr 2020 #28
They are projecting no new deaths after July 6. Ms. Toad Apr 2020 #29
And very few in June. Nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #30
The first wave BGBD Apr 2020 #32
Seems like they have been consistently way off. Blue_true Apr 2020 #33
Seems like a non-sense estimate to me. Will probably be over twice that. mackdaddy May 2020 #35
You are correct! nt USALiberal May 2020 #36
You are correct! Nt USALiberal May 2020 #38
Snarky.... Might be true if every Gov. stops reporting like FL is now? Brainfodder May 2020 #39
90-100 thousand. sarcasmo May 2020 #40
i believe that is the group that was saying about 60k two weeks ago......... Takket May 2020 #41
That Prediction, Sir The Magistrate May 2020 #44
No, it's their mean prediction after April 27th, with current conditions muriel_volestrangler May 2020 #45
Then They Fucked Up, Sir The Magistrate May 2020 #47
Biden and all the other Democrats need to start focusing on excess deaths and all-out accuse Trump Celerity May 2020 #49
CDC is actually using Carnegie-Mellon's model DeminPennswoods May 2020 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What am I missing? IMHE (...»Reply #19