General Discussion

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)

33. Shhhhh... You're giving the NYPD ideas...

Reply to 4th law of robotics (Reply #31)

Thu Sep 13, 2012, 06:45 PM

Sep 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We've been told any action reasonably expected to elicit a violent response [View all] Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 OP

Our extremists are worse than theirs because our extremists expect others JoePhilly Sep 2012 #1

I'm not sure how that relates to the OP Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #2

I think there could be a case made for inciting a riot, hate speech violations or renie408 Sep 2012 #3

You know for a fact what they intended to do? Missycim Sep 2012 #14

The standard should be the truth, not the ability of others to handle it. wickerwoman Sep 2012 #17

Excellent point. Do gays holding hands in public incite gay-bashers? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #23

The government of Egypt wants to charge him and anyone else involved- haele Sep 2012 #20

Your interpretation of the First Amendment is too narrow. Jim Lane Sep 2012 #53

if every one KNEW this was going to happen MrDiaz Sep 2012 #51

I just reread what you wrote and I think I disagree a bit. renie408 Sep 2012 #4

so if people riot because of what your write here, you are responsible for the riots? ok nt msongs Sep 2012 #7

If your intent was to get them to riot ... probably yes. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #10

How are you EVER going to prove that in a court of law MNBrewer Sep 2012 #12

Did I say we need to take the idiot to court? Don't think I did. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #13

Fair enough. MNBrewer Sep 2012 #15

np ... I follow you. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #18

It relates to the reailty of what is actually going on, as described in your OP. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #9

So you say but the reality -- the real reality -- is there are terrorists who killed Americans Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #16

No, the US won;t be punnishing "our extremist" in this situaiton. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #19

If mocking people's sacred beliefs automatically make someone an extremist Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #21

You suck at this ... the guy who created that video had an intent. You can PRETEND JoePhilly Sep 2012 #25

Let's cut to the chase Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #27

How exactly does option A differ from option C? JoePhilly Sep 2012 #29

I would expect anyone under a credible threat of violence to be protected Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #35

Truly. The most horrible kind of people are those who *don't* go around murdering others 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #30

A suggestion for you Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #5

And how would that prove the validity of violent bullying? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #22

It'd prove the blind stupidity of thinking that deliberate provocation should be ignored Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #41

Just because someone wants to react violently doesn't mean we capitulate Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #43

Not the same thing Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #48

"Would not be protected speech in most countries"? Really? Zalatix Sep 2012 #50

That does not make Europe the paragon of civil liberties. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #52

You know it is crazy Livluvgrow Sep 2012 #6

Of course ...the Boston Tea Party was responsible for the British being violent. L0oniX Sep 2012 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Sep 2012 #11

I think the filmmakers could certainly be hammered for other reasons BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #24

I don't agree with the statement of first sentence tama Sep 2012 #26

Fair enough but I restricting my comments to the subject at hand and Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #28

I cannot fully follow your line of argument tama Sep 2012 #36

I think we're mostly in agreement. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #42

Violence begets violence tama Sep 2012 #46

How does that apply here? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #40

I'm not tama Sep 2012 #47

If I recall protests have occasion led to riots and other forms of violence 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #31

Shhhhh... You're giving the NYPD ideas... Zalatix Sep 2012 #33

But but incitement. . . hate speech . . . stochastic terrorism. . . 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #34

That is 180-degrees from what I'm arguing; so perhaps we're in agreement Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #37

I wasn't arguing against you 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #39

I was thinking you were but I wasn't sure. Thank-you n/t Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #44

See post #26 nt tama Sep 2012 #38

Tell the Teabaggers "an African American is going to be President for 2 terms, DEAL WITH IT!!!" Zalatix Sep 2012 #32

This film was made in US so we were blamed and innocent people died, not the filmmaker julian09 Sep 2012 #45

Nonsense ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #49