Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,666 posts)
7. The numbers are strange.
Sat May 2, 2020, 11:21 PM
May 2020

Only this source reports that high a number. It may be that the CDC finally caught up on reporting. Might be a typo--it's about 1000 higher than every other reporting source. For some, outliers require an explanation. For others, outliers are taken to be more representative of the *real* data than most of the data.

Remember that with all due regard to CNBC it is *not* the number of people who died in the 24 hour reporting period. At this point it's not a facile error, it's a foolish error. WHO can't know the actual number of deaths; in fact, the CDC probably doesn't know the actual number who died; both just know what's reported. WHO says as much, but it requires reading the technical apparatus to understand the data. I know, "reading."

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports is a good source for this kind of thing, if you want. They track usual reported numbers fairly closely except for that one report. It doesn't show up among the errata in situation report 103, but may be because nobody cares about them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The USA just reported its...»Reply #7