You remember that big anti-organic food study last week? Guess who funded it.

[mathematic]

10. Science is great.

Unless it contradicts my worldview. Then it was obviously funded by my ideological enemies. But thanks, I've enjoyed reading about how The Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University are engaged in a conspiracy to promote poisonous for-profit food that will surely not meet the nutritional needs of any human, domestic animal, or pet rock. Not to mention all the spiritual damage this so-called food does.

Again, it's nice to know that the study that says there is no nutritional difference between organics and non-organics is wrong, even though nobody promoting organics has ever said that there is a difference. I've definitely never seen that claim from any organic consumer associations or anything.

I'm also shocked that a retired statistics professor accepted money from the Council for Tobacco Research to conduct fraudulent research. He's almost certainly a horrible human being and probably incompetent. I'm only sorry there was no way to look up his career achievements and personal accomplishments on the internet or even find the fraudulent research paper he published.