Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(90,966 posts)
13. And we SHOULD use McConnell's rules.
Wed May 6, 2020, 03:28 PM
May 2020

SICK AND TIRED of "fighting fair."

"Fighting Fair" demands a level playing field. Where both sides are evenly matched and have legitimately equal chances to win.

When one side refuses to play fair, in other words - demanding the right to cheat, to tilt the playing field, rig the game, to put a thumb on the scale, then there's no longer such a thing as "fighting fair." That's GONE. Then it's not a mere game anymore. And there is no "playing". If no rules apply, then no rules apply to OUR side either.

If that's the way the game is played now, and we say we want to play to win, THIS is how you win, because if you want to play to win, these days? THIS is how you have to play. unfortunately. If you play it straight and the other side cheats and wins, then there's a different "game" to play now, and it requires different rules. Basically, seems to me, if we have to play nasty because the other guys play nasty, and we have to re-tilt the playing field, what's actually happening is, ironically, leveling the playing field once again. On their level, yes. But it's no longer tilted in one side's favor.

Seems to me, anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R for visibility. crickets May 2020 #1
K&R 2naSalit May 2020 #2
⭐️⭐️K&R⭐️⭐️ spanone May 2020 #3
k & r Baitball Blogger May 2020 #4
After McGrath replaces McConnell, and Biden replaces Trump, we can use McConnell's rules. lagomorph777 May 2020 #5
And we SHOULD use McConnell's rules. calimary May 2020 #13
Total agreement. Grokenstein May 2020 #23
So do I, my friend! calimary May 2020 #26
Hell yes! BigmanPigman May 2020 #16
FDR. It didn't go well, due to Congressional opposition. lagomorph777 May 2020 #19
I thought of him too BigmanPigman May 2020 #22
waste of time stopdiggin May 2020 #6
I agree.. PR maneuver.... reACTIONary May 2020 #24
Ooh, That's Gotta Hurt! Harry Walpurgisnacht May 2020 #7
Welcome to DU, Harry Walpurgisnacht. calimary May 2020 #14
It seems highly unlikely that anything will come of this. Why would Roberts care? (nt) scarletwoman May 2020 #8
It's good that someone asked for an investigation Bettie May 2020 #9
K&R redstatebluegirl May 2020 #10
CJ Roberts has made lofty statements about nonpartisanship in the judiciary bucolic_frolic May 2020 #11
The Repukes only believe in fairness and equality FakeNoose May 2020 #15
Unfortunately the hearing is going forward Bev54 May 2020 #12
This may not end up going anywhere ... aggiesal May 2020 #17
Expect nothing. Grins May 2020 #18
May not go anywhere but payback is a bitch. Pepsidog May 2020 #20
the left keeps expecting the right Alpeduez21 May 2020 #21
Why do you think Butterflylady May 2020 #25
Fallon had to speak carefully. Igel May 2020 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice Roberts in ...»Reply #13