Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. How does that article support the assertion...
Tue May 12, 2020, 12:27 PM
May 2020

"this quackery was circulating in certain corners of the internet"


It's actually not surprising that increased use and attention to these kinds of products would result in increased poisonings. The article notes that cleaning supplies are, normally, the leading cause of calls to poison centers.

I doubt the class of "internet users" is among the largest contingent of people who would be under the false impression this would help them. I would also doubt the largest share of actual poisoning victims remain children in the vicinity of carelessly used or stored products (again as a function of increased use).

It is also the case that, by definition, 50% of the public is of below average intelligence. At places like DU, we enjoy mocking people with intellectual deficits and giving them "Darwin Awards" because we are superior to them.

There are still frightened young women who douche with stuff like this in the belief it will prevent pregnancy too.

But the suggestion that a statement made by Trump on April 23, is responsible for a two-month increase in disinfectant poisonings that began in March, is every bit as stupid as the belief that drinking it will cure this infection.

Look at the reply on the main thread, just below this subthread.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Accidental poisonings fro...»Reply #7