Today's simple lesson: If you don't want pictures of you topless to go public-----

[Atman]

95. Oh, you again.

And it's always "nifty" that you're there to speak up for every human on Earth. She did NOT have her "privacy invaded." She was outside, and she KNEW she was constantly stalked by paparazzi. I disagree 100% with the other poster (maybe it was you) who likened it to a paparazzi sticking his head in your window and taking a picture. COMPLETELY different thing. She is a celebrity. She was outside, obviously in view of cameras. I'm not saying she shouldn't be upset, I'm saying she shouldn't be surprised. What was she thinking? Especially after what just happened to Harry? When you are followed 24/7, THAT should be what you're upset about, not that someone finally got the picture you KNEW they were looking for.

I've been to nude beaches, but no one wants a picture of me. I am not a celebrity. But still, if I saw some dude trying to take a picture of my wife (or me, for whatever strange reason they might do that), I'd confront them. But if I KNEW, as Kate must have known, that she was likely being stalked by paparazzi, why would she put herself in that situation?

I'm tired of your bullshit, Goddess of all thing fem, telling those of us -- who, seriously, are on your side. I AM a feminist. I DO support women's rights on every level. This has NOTHING to do with that -- telling those of us that we're somehow trying to diminish your concerns, or whatever the hell you're doing. This is about Harry, just as it is about Kate, and it doesn't matter whether you have breasts (last I heard, Harry has breasts, too) or a dick, or whatever. THAT IS NOT THE POINT. It is entirely about a celebrity who put herself "out there," and then got upset that people hired to "see her" saw her.