Conspiracy to incite riot vs free speech

[Jessy169]

70. What are you saying?

That only learned experts on any given subject should post their opinions on DU? Seems like it.

In case you didn't read the many comments, I have been very clear that I am interested in getting expert legal opinions on this subject, and not myself qualified to argue the legal details. The opinions expressed have been to solicit other points of view. Do you think that should be discouraged?

I've had many experiences with attorneys, including winning my own cases in court pro se. I have found that sometimes attorneys who think they know what they are talking about frequently do not, and that in many cases an attorney's arrogance often seems inversely proportionate to how smart that lawyer actually is.

Still, I value your opinion and won't ask for your expert qualifications to offer it.

BTW, since you posted under the lincoln.edu/criminaljustice list of when "freedom of speech" is not protected, I'm wondering if you have legal arguments in mind as to what if any of those points are not actually valid. If you do, I would be interested to now your opinion.