Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)2. I personally think romney's the reason. people just don't trust him
and can't see him dealing with foreign policy. Every time he opens his mouth he seems to make it worse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]
WCGreen
Sep 2012
OP
And that is because he is so exposed due to the slogging nature of this campaign
WCGreen
Sep 2012
#7
There is nothing ''fair'' about that comparison. A group of citizens reacting to a bloodless coup is
Guy Whitey Corngood
Sep 2012
#36
I voted for Perot, so I know the "Bush lost because of Perot" claim is invalid.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#6
I think they didn't vote. I do not think Perot took any more votes from Bush Sr than from Clinton.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#17
When I have a little more time I will go back and see how the numbers played out.
WCGreen
Sep 2012
#37
Those of us who voted for Perot probably paid more attention to him than others.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#41
And this is why the Repubs use the tactics they do to try and hold onto power.
Jennicut
Sep 2012
#46