Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
76. It's one thing to insult the KKK, another to insult them when they're surrounding a friend's house..
Sat Sep 15, 2012, 07:32 AM
Sep 2012

...with torches lit. You're safely mocking the KKK from where they can't get at you. But they can get at your friends. If you want to poke at an angry tiger, have at it. But if a group of innocent people are stuck in a cage with that tiger, then poking at it from outside the cage is irresponsible, and makes you culpable for putting them in danger. THEY presumably know the tiger better than you, and you shouldn't poke at it without asking them first if this is a good idea, because THEY are the ones who will suffer the consequences. Not you.

This is why this situation is problematic. Not because these people don't have the right to insult religions, but that they don't have the right to put other people's lives in danger just because they want to insult a religion. The religion, we should especially note, of several theocracies. In the U.S. the government is on the film maker's side and, presumably, will make an effort to stop people from beating him up over his insults to their religion. But in a theocracy, the government isn't on the side of person insulting the religion; in fact, the government is as likely to beat up film maker over the insult as random people are.

We're not talking about getting hate mail from religious fanatics here. These are insults that can motivate a government to take action because the damn government is a theocracy. And such insults matter to them. Which is why it's "okay" to insult a religion in the U.S. (not a theocracy--at least not yet), but it is not okay to insult the religion of a powder-key theocracy. Especially not when innocents might pay the price.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pssst! xfundy Sep 2012 #1
we can make the world a better place fraankky Sep 2012 #101
I don't believe in any god kdmorris Sep 2012 #122
"rioting madmen". right. gotcha cali Sep 2012 #2
I agree MrDiaz Sep 2012 #5
Hey don't blame Obama - it was Hillary who let this crap get outta hand. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #12
Seriously? Blame Hillary? dkf Sep 2012 #147
Why didn't he wave his magic wand and get rid of this stuff? nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #41
This is 60 years in the making ArcticFox Sep 2012 #160
Yes, it's more about the drones and the invasions than some stupid movie. Zalatix Sep 2012 #14
but you didn't remotely say that in the OP cali Sep 2012 #17
No, because my OP is addressing people who think that the film maker should be punished. Zalatix Sep 2012 #18
So your premise is that .. 99Forever Sep 2012 #100
He's not inciting acts of violence. Yours is a strange, strange world. Fortunately it is NOT America Zalatix Sep 2012 #103
So your response is a weak attempt at a petty... 99Forever Sep 2012 #114
Wait, you can dish out the weak, petty insults, but you can't take one back at you? Awwwww. Zalatix Sep 2012 #119
The point smart guy... 99Forever Sep 2012 #123
Zalatix wasn't denying anyone's "free speech rights". The concern was over violence. Riots. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #127
Nonsense. 99Forever Sep 2012 #128
Critisize the film all you want. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #135
Where the fuck did I EVER... 99Forever Sep 2012 #142
Excuse me, you accused me of opposing others' rights to criticize "Innocence of Muslims". Zalatix Sep 2012 #145
Where did anybody say they DIDN'T have the right to call for his punishment? eqfan592 Sep 2012 #148
99Forever made that up out of thin air and they know they did. Zalatix Sep 2012 #150
Show the post where I ever opposed anyone's right to speak out against "Innocence of Muslims". Zalatix Sep 2012 #146
See how 99Forever avoids direct and clearly-written challenges to his/her falsehoods? Zalatix Sep 2012 #149
Speaking of temper tantrums. 99Forever Sep 2012 #154
LOL you can't handle being wrong. You lost the argument. Bye! Zalatix Sep 2012 #158
"Bigoted head"? Now you are an outright malicious LIAR. You made that up out of thin air. Zalatix Sep 2012 #141
He can't address the valid point you're making cuz his arguments are so full of holes. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #129
Yep. 99Forever Sep 2012 #132
You falsely accused me of opposing others' rights to criticize the "Innocent of Muslims" film. Zalatix Sep 2012 #143
He may have the right to make such a film, as disgusting as it is, but he must also be prepared to face the consequences. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #24
Define "face the consequences" Zalatix Sep 2012 #25
As those of faith like to say, you reap what you sow - this guy deserves to be "reaped" big time for provoking people, knowing what the reaction would be. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #30
Nobody who insults religions here gets "reaped". Why do you think it should be different Zalatix Sep 2012 #31
You can't be this naive. It's different because the idiot insulted people who he had to know would not react kindly to such insults. Doh! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #40
You can't be this ignorant of the law. The law says incitement to riot means calling for violence. Zalatix Sep 2012 #44
U even called the rioters "MADMEN" who by definition dont act RATIONALLY-so yes u CAN incite violence w/o explicitly callin 4 it if theres a reasonable expectation it will ensue. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #55
You openly accuse me of stupidity and then you REPEATEDLY engage in stupidity yourself. Zalatix Sep 2012 #57
. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #64
Thank you for proving my point once again. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #67
You have no point. Zalatix Sep 2012 #70
And your point is? LOL InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #73
You still have no point. Zalatix Sep 2012 #77
based on your stance MrDiaz Sep 2012 #104
Westboro Baptist are madmen who don't act rationally Telly Savalas Sep 2012 #136
he probably lives in the US instead of Egypt because alc Sep 2012 #81
No he should not be imprisoned treestar Sep 2012 #153
Good point but you left out a biggie... limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #37
No, this is about people rioting over a video. Waiting For Everyman Sep 2012 #54
sorry, but this didn't happen in a vacuum cali Sep 2012 #98
The riots and protests are now also occurring in first world countries like the UK and Australia riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #111
And you 'know' this because... randome Sep 2012 #66
I know this because it's fucking obvious to anyone with a functional brain cell or two. cali Sep 2012 #99
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #3
I think it borders on the grotesque to claim that DU cali Sep 2012 #4
Dehumanizing them is okay, though? Scootaloo Sep 2012 #7
id say anyone who thinks its okay to riot and kill because someone insults some guy in their religio loli phabay Sep 2012 #8
I don't think the majority of folks here dehumanize women or Moslems or any other group cali Sep 2012 #9
True, but the Muslim religion is often used to dehumanize women in the EXTREME and not a peep from Hillary! Maybe it's time to call her out. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #19
You deny that rioting madmen killed a US ambassador? Does anyone have a logical basis to deny that? Zalatix Sep 2012 #16
And if people know that these rioting madmen exist, don'tcha think they have a responsibility not to do things that will provoke those madmen into committing heinous acts? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #33
No more responsibility than I have in avoiding provoking the KKK. Zalatix Sep 2012 #36
You serious? I never said the rioters are not responsible for THEIR actions - they are - but the filmmaker is ALSO responsible for inciting the rioters. What's so hard to understand? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #45
What part of "the film maker is NOT responsible for inciting the rioters" do you not understand? Zalatix Sep 2012 #48
LOL! Who said anything about restrictin free speech? Ur embarrassin urself w/ these strawman arguments but i defend UR right of free speech & 2 make a fool of urself. 2 funny! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #58
No restrictions, eh? Then perhaps someone hacked your account and posted this while you were gone. Zalatix Sep 2012 #62
That u stretch what I'm sayin 4 ur silly point is laughable-we punish speech when it causes harm-if u yell fire in a crowded theatre or slander.U really this ignorant or just pullin my leg? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #69
You're being DISHONEST to deny that saying someone should be REAPED doesn't constitute punishment. Zalatix Sep 2012 #71
Its the same when u know the consequences of ur actions. Many slander suits r based on unfounded statements known 2 be false & r well deserving of punishment. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #75
Criticizing a religion is NOT "yelling fire" or slander. Sorry, your argument is still uneducated. Zalatix Sep 2012 #78
I took the "reaped"... malokvale77 Sep 2012 #125
Anyone is free to trash talk that idiot film maker. His film was idiotic. We all agree on that. Zalatix Sep 2012 #137
I deny it in the specific ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #88
So the film maker wasn't at fault by even the most irrational stretch of the imagination? Zalatix Sep 2012 #91
I believe at this point rabblerousers are citing it to whip up a frenzy ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #96
They have no idea of the consequences of their attacks on free speech. Zalatix Sep 2012 #105
The belligerents don't even understand the concept...which is part of the problem ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #120
In Australia?? The UK??? Indonesia??? Really? riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #121
Indeed ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #124
But those countries have an educated populace who know that we do riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #126
lets see if you can answer this MrDiaz Sep 2012 #6
They would be putting you in jail because... Hubert Flottz Sep 2012 #11
wtf MrDiaz Sep 2012 #15
I didn't understand that either. Quantess Sep 2012 #43
You're claiming MrDiaz is insane? Zalatix Sep 2012 #46
Yes atreides1 Sep 2012 #97
Your argument is insane. Zalatix Sep 2012 #102
lol MrDiaz Sep 2012 #110
If you're referring to my suggestion they be sued jsmirman Sep 2012 #10
So, Zalatix is continuing an attack into a "new" thread...?...eom Kolesar Sep 2012 #20
Apparently, no. jsmirman Sep 2012 #28
Nope, I'm talking about the suggestions of lawsuits over wrongful death and "inciting violence" Zalatix Sep 2012 #23
Ok, just checking jsmirman Sep 2012 #27
Boy, that escalated quickly. Lasher Sep 2012 #13
File this one under: "fucked premise" ... eom Kolesar Sep 2012 #21
Nothing fucked about my premise. n/t Zalatix Sep 2012 #22
People don't get killed for being Christian in America eridani Sep 2012 #26
Excellent point, often overlooked by warmongers. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #34
Christians are killed around the world daily. nt NCTraveler Sep 2012 #116
There's a difference.. sendero Sep 2012 #29
"villifying with extreme prejudice"... is that illegal in America? Care to cite the law on that? Zalatix Sep 2012 #39
Unrec... joeybee12 Sep 2012 #32
Yes, I am reading EXACTLY what other people are saying. Zalatix Sep 2012 #38
Okay okay, technically you may be "reading" what others are saying, but you're obviously not comprehending (or intentionally provoking like that idiot filmmaker). InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #47
I comprehend it perfectly. You will not ever show otherwise. You have no facts to back you up. Zalatix Sep 2012 #49
Oh okay, so you ARE intentionally provoking people here w/ your comments, like that idiot filmmaker, and now facing the consequences of your stupidity by being called out on it. I get it, thanks for c InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #50
I admit I have provoked you into hurling an irrational personal attack. Zalatix Sep 2012 #51
LOL! Nice try, but your making inane comments speaks for itself. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #53
Inane? You're the one who has no facts, no logic and no basis behind your arguments. Zalatix Sep 2012 #56
Really? We don't sue people 4 criticism? Ever heard of slander based on unfounded criticism intended 2 cause harm? Keep diggin, tho u really should stop embarrassing urself InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #61
Stop making a fool of yourself and name me one case where a RELIGION has sued for slander. Zalatix Sep 2012 #83
lol you should MrDiaz Sep 2012 #113
so if InAbLuEsTaTe insulted you 2pooped2pop Sep 2012 #65
Good idea! You know what, if I kill someone in anger over what InAbLuEsTaTe said Zalatix Sep 2012 #68
no really 2pooped2pop Sep 2012 #74
Just when I thought your argument couldn't get more inaccurate Zalatix Sep 2012 #79
Precisely! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #72
So if your arguments drive me to kill someone and I say you drove me to it then you should be REAPED Zalatix Sep 2012 #80
BINGO Zax2me Sep 2012 #35
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #42
Well, Islam has no base, no "pope" longship Sep 2012 #52
Oh HELL NO!! You go ahead and be as insulting as you want!! renie408 Sep 2012 #59
Maybe tama Sep 2012 #60
Quit blaming basic American freedoms for this JCMach1 Sep 2012 #63
It's one thing to insult the KKK, another to insult them when they're surrounding a friend's house.. Moonwalk Sep 2012 #76
That was an excellent analogy. renie408 Sep 2012 #82
Precisely! It's irrisponsible and should be punishable. All we're sayin. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2012 #94
But it's not punishable. That's what American freedoms are all about. Zalatix Sep 2012 #112
Irrisponsible, absolutely. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #138
LOL!!! There is no such thing as mocking the KKK from a safe distance. Zalatix Sep 2012 #85
South Carolina here, and you are not kidding. renie408 Sep 2012 #87
None. Zalatix Sep 2012 #90
COOL!! renie408 Sep 2012 #106
And if I tell your neighbors that you oppose free speech, and they kill you, then I'm OK, too! Zalatix Sep 2012 #107
It's one thing to insult someone who won't fight back 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #117
So what about being an abortion doctor? dkf Sep 2012 #155
"...surrounding a friend's house with torches lit." skypilot Sep 2012 #156
We aren't already predisposed to hating what is being done in our name. Our infrastructures 2on2u Sep 2012 #84
Then as I said to Cali, the problem is not the film maker, but US imperialism. Zalatix Sep 2012 #86
Why can't it be both? renie408 Sep 2012 #89
Held accountable HOW? Zalatix Sep 2012 #93
Well, we could "unfriend" him. n/t 2on2u Sep 2012 #95
You could charge him with a crime. renie408 Sep 2012 #108
Okay, what crime? Show me a court that'll uphold that. Go ahead, I'll wait. Zalatix Sep 2012 #109
The riots and protests are now also occurring in first world countries like the UK and Australia riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #92
If christians were to murder Andres Serrano (of piss-christ fame) 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #115
of course not, he's a white Westerner. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #133
Now we are sending in troops sorefeet Sep 2012 #118
Still trying to justify letting crazy people dictate our rights? Zalatix Sep 2012 #140
Censorship is OK if victims of Western Imperialism are offended! Odin2005 Sep 2012 #130
Yes, they are. It's actually very disturbing. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #139
It's the victory of the 60's New Left over the 30's Old Left. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #144
First amendment. Works if you're money, too. nt valerief Sep 2012 #131
It is OK to insult religious beliefs anywhere Progressive dog Sep 2012 #134
Don't insult anybody's religion beliefs treestar Sep 2012 #151
Absolutely no one is denying that "Innocence of Muslims" was bad form. Zalatix Sep 2012 #152
That's not the point. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #157
Then perhaps you haven't been reading? Zalatix Sep 2012 #159
This seems morer suited to the Meta forum. On that absis I am locking this with an invitation . . . Stinky The Clown Sep 2012 #161
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So it's okay to insult re...»Reply #76