Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Courtesy Flush

(4,558 posts)

12. Really? Is that all?

Reply to madville (Reply #9)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 08:22 AM

Sep 2012

I was thinking more in line with Bill left the country in better shape than he found it, and Bush ran it through a diesel-powered shredder.

Remove the personalities, and the result is the same.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did you notice that an impeached president [View all] Courtesy Flush Sep 2012 OP

Clinton was not impeached but thank you for your concern. valerief Sep 2012 #1

He was impeached, but acquitted. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #2

Impeachment requires Senate approval, but the Senate acquitted him. valerief Sep 2012 #3

Wrong. The trial by the House was the impeachment. kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #5

Semantics, but no..... Wounded Bear Sep 2012 #6

House initiates and votes on impeachment. Senate tries impeachment. valerief Sep 2012 #8

You've got it. (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #11

. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #7

He certainly WAS, lol. He was not, however, convicted. kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #4

He was indeed impeached by the House. nt woolldog Sep 2012 #10

Bill is likable, Bush was not madville Sep 2012 #9

Really? Is that all? Courtesy Flush Sep 2012 #12

Clinton is an example of "you never know what will happen" lunatica Sep 2012 #13