Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]Don't we all. Except I'm kind of enjoying the drama. I'm so far away I don't have to list to the constant TV commercials and news very often. Watching it from a far is actually pretty interesting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]
WCGreen
Sep 2012
OP
And that is because he is so exposed due to the slogging nature of this campaign
WCGreen
Sep 2012
#7
There is nothing ''fair'' about that comparison. A group of citizens reacting to a bloodless coup is
Guy Whitey Corngood
Sep 2012
#36
I voted for Perot, so I know the "Bush lost because of Perot" claim is invalid.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#6
I think they didn't vote. I do not think Perot took any more votes from Bush Sr than from Clinton.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#17
When I have a little more time I will go back and see how the numbers played out.
WCGreen
Sep 2012
#37
Those of us who voted for Perot probably paid more attention to him than others.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#41
And this is why the Repubs use the tactics they do to try and hold onto power.
Jennicut
Sep 2012
#46