Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Strelnikov_

(8,171 posts)
13. Based on the following paragraph
Sat Sep 15, 2012, 01:13 PM
Sep 2012
On Friday, U.S. courts spokeswoman Karen Redmond said the Office of Probation in the Central District of California is reviewing whether Nakoula, who was convicted on bank fraud charges, violated terms of his probation in relation to the video and its uploading onto the Internet.

He had been ordered not to own or use devices with access to the Internet without approval from his probation officer -– and any approved computers were to be used for work only. "Defendant shall not access a computer for any other purpose," the terms read.

Restrictions were also placed on his enlisting others to access the Internet for him.


I would say he is about to be violated.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, but at this moment he is probably being violated Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #1
The parole violation I believe is local. It would be odd to involve the Feds Cleita Sep 2012 #2
Think he is on parole for Federal fraud conviction. n/t Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #5
Exactly! DonViejo Sep 2012 #15
Hard to tell jsr Sep 2012 #3
There's no doubt he's a con artist and could possibly pull Cleita Sep 2012 #7
He's already out jsr Sep 2012 #11
What could they do anyway? Life Long Dem Sep 2012 #31
Based on the following paragraph Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #13
It sure looks like it jsr Sep 2012 #21
A one-way ticket to Gitmo for producing a film. Bets that he won't even be charged with any crime? Zalatix Sep 2012 #4
The Feds involved make me wonder that more is afoot than Cleita Sep 2012 #10
I want to know what constituted a parole violation...? Zalatix Sep 2012 #22
From the story linked in the OP: pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #25
If he is an Egyptian whistler162 Sep 2012 #6
That could happen.n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #8
He is a naturalized citizen jsr Sep 2012 #16
You can still be stripped of your citizenship and deported if you are a naturalized citizen. Cleita Sep 2012 #20
Maybe they should look at his immigration files jsr Sep 2012 #24
He was questioned and released pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #9
That's too bad. Cleita Sep 2012 #12
The excerpt is from the OP link pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #18
Are you suggesting he should be in Gitmo? cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #14
More so than many of those who are in Gitmo for eternity Cleita Sep 2012 #17
It is sad to live in a world with people such as yourself cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #28
Federal fraud conviction nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #19
I stand corrected. Cleita Sep 2012 #23
That could set a dangerous precedent nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #27
I meant post #29 for you. n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #30
I don't see anyone saying the movie can't be shown or made. Cleita Sep 2012 #29
More from "The Wall Street Journal" Cleita Sep 2012 #26
Is there anything they can do him other than a good firm talking to? bluestateguy Sep 2012 #32
This has nothing to do with inciting riots ck4829 Sep 2012 #33
He did get Americans killed. Cleita Sep 2012 #34
No he did not ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #35
I wasn't talking about Benghazi. Cleita Sep 2012 #36
You still do not have exclusive cause and effect ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #37
The article specifically states that the Taliban said it was because of the movie Cleita Sep 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alleged anti-Muslim filmm...»Reply #13