Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
26. More from "The Wall Street Journal"
Sat Sep 15, 2012, 01:29 PM
Sep 2012

It seems he was under house arrest already if I'm reading this right.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444517304577653394041764330.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Federal authorities have identified Mr. Nakoula, a self-described Coptic Christian, as the key figure behind a video denigrating Islam and the Prophet Muhammad that ignited mob violence against U.S. embassies across the Middle East. A federal law enforcement officials said Thursday that authorities had connected Mr. Nakoula to a man using the pseudonym of Sam Bacile who claimed earlier to be writer and director of the film.

Violent protests set off by the film in Libya played a role in mob attacks in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other American officials. U.S. Embassy gates in Cairo were breached by protesters and demonstrations against American missions spread to Yemen on Thursday and on Friday to several other countries.

Mr. Nakoula pleaded no contest in 2010 to federal bank fraud charges in California and was ordered to pay more than $790,000 in restitution. He was also sentenced to 21 months in federal prison and was ordered not to use computers or the Internet for five years without approval from his probation officer.

His attorney cited Mr. Nakoula's poor health in a bid for leniency and home detention, stating his client suffered from hepatitis C, diabetes that require twice-daily insulin shots, and other ailments that required more than 10 medications a day, according to a transcript of the sentencing obtained by the AP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, but at this moment he is probably being violated Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #1
The parole violation I believe is local. It would be odd to involve the Feds Cleita Sep 2012 #2
Think he is on parole for Federal fraud conviction. n/t Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #5
Exactly! DonViejo Sep 2012 #15
Hard to tell jsr Sep 2012 #3
There's no doubt he's a con artist and could possibly pull Cleita Sep 2012 #7
He's already out jsr Sep 2012 #11
What could they do anyway? Life Long Dem Sep 2012 #31
Based on the following paragraph Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #13
It sure looks like it jsr Sep 2012 #21
A one-way ticket to Gitmo for producing a film. Bets that he won't even be charged with any crime? Zalatix Sep 2012 #4
The Feds involved make me wonder that more is afoot than Cleita Sep 2012 #10
I want to know what constituted a parole violation...? Zalatix Sep 2012 #22
From the story linked in the OP: pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #25
If he is an Egyptian whistler162 Sep 2012 #6
That could happen.n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #8
He is a naturalized citizen jsr Sep 2012 #16
You can still be stripped of your citizenship and deported if you are a naturalized citizen. Cleita Sep 2012 #20
Maybe they should look at his immigration files jsr Sep 2012 #24
He was questioned and released pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #9
That's too bad. Cleita Sep 2012 #12
The excerpt is from the OP link pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #18
Are you suggesting he should be in Gitmo? cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #14
More so than many of those who are in Gitmo for eternity Cleita Sep 2012 #17
It is sad to live in a world with people such as yourself cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #28
Federal fraud conviction nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #19
I stand corrected. Cleita Sep 2012 #23
That could set a dangerous precedent nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #27
I meant post #29 for you. n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #30
I don't see anyone saying the movie can't be shown or made. Cleita Sep 2012 #29
More from "The Wall Street Journal" Cleita Sep 2012 #26
Is there anything they can do him other than a good firm talking to? bluestateguy Sep 2012 #32
This has nothing to do with inciting riots ck4829 Sep 2012 #33
He did get Americans killed. Cleita Sep 2012 #34
No he did not ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #35
I wasn't talking about Benghazi. Cleita Sep 2012 #36
You still do not have exclusive cause and effect ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #37
The article specifically states that the Taliban said it was because of the movie Cleita Sep 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alleged anti-Muslim filmm...»Reply #26