Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AleksS

(1,718 posts)
27. This!
Sun May 31, 2020, 02:30 PM
May 2020

I think you hit it on the nose with: "Political strategizing might best be focused on fastening responsibility for chaos on the cheap thug whose misrule is in fact responsible for the general condition of unrest."

Nixon won as the guy who was not in office and was promising to bring back law and order. Trump can't be that since his administration brought the chaos in the first place.

When you're running the show, and it's a shitshow, then you can't run as the guy who'll stop the shitshow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you StarfishSaver May 2020 #1
We need confidence and faith. WE WILL WIN WITH JOE. LakeArenal May 2020 #2
I really really really hope so pamdb May 2020 #3
This. BannonsLiver May 2020 #4
Great point -- this series of events *will* affect the election, but the "how" remains in play fishwax May 2020 #5
Hear Hear, Sir The Magistrate May 2020 #6
This! AleksS May 2020 #27
Trumps attempt to cover up a pandemic, ended his chance to win re-election. shockey80 May 2020 #7
Trump has lost his grip on controlling the narrative lunatica May 2020 #25
Exactly! lucca18 May 2020 #8
I agree Penn Voter May 2020 #9
Thank you. GoCubsGo May 2020 #10
I was one who made the comparison to 1968, and no, I'm not Vlad. Squinch May 2020 #11
If there were no unrest, they would still use the southern strategy maxrandb May 2020 #23
You know that and I know that. He will convince at least 40% differently. Squinch May 2020 #40
Great points. If Repugs want to compare election years - I'd say: try 1992 sandensea May 2020 #12
Tell that to BrieBrie Joy and David Srirota... The're sniping Biden left and right, and telling ehrnst May 2020 #13
I agree ...no more doom and gloom...we are going to beat the crap out of Donnie. Demsrule86 May 2020 #14
I've lost track of all the learned helplessness posts/tweets CBHagman May 2020 #15
If this dipshit was the Captain of your ship, would you rehire him? maxrandb May 2020 #20
Yes, indeed. Magoo48 May 2020 #16
He hates all this would resign if he could get pardoned marlakay May 2020 #17
For all we know he might lunatica May 2020 #29
Bingo. We don't need to sell out to win! marble falls May 2020 #18
Well said. Thank you. nt crickets May 2020 #19
K&R UTUSN May 2020 #21
Exactly right....Our thoughts play a role Viz May 2020 #22
You said 49 at first, but then said 40-45 Polybius May 2020 #24
Yeah, anything above 30 States would be a landslide maxrandb May 2020 #32
Well, it depends which of those 30 states are won Polybius May 2020 #38
Thanks. I'm sick of it! Nt ecstatic May 2020 #26
Thank you!!! Folks, Trump is NOT gonna win this!! DinahMoeHum May 2020 #28
KISS. Keep it Simple Stupid. Make *Leadership* SayItLoud May 2020 #30
How about 50 states greblach May 2020 #31
Historically, landslide wins don't mean that much by the time the next election rolls around. totodeinhere May 2020 #36
Only George Washington won every state Polybius May 2020 #39
the narrative that this is going to help Donnie "win" is flat wrong stopdiggin May 2020 #33
I think it's very legitimate to be concerned about the electoral consequences of the current totodeinhere May 2020 #34
I just don't think the incumbent president showing videos of riots helps him maxrandb May 2020 #37
Agree!! Posters need to stop hanging crepe and stirring up doubt! Thekaspervote May 2020 #35
I feel reasonably sure that we can win wnylib May 2020 #41
Part of that will necessarilly be.. Shiv Jun 2020 #42
Trump Pandemic, Trump Recession PNW-Dem Jun 2020 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need to STOP thinking ...»Reply #27