Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)USC Fratboy Email Calls Women “Targets;” Declares “Giving Them A Name Is Pointless” [View all]
In another isolated incident involving a college fraternity advocating misogyny of the highest order, an email has been circulating around the campus of the University of Southern California that, at first blush, would appear to be a tasteless joke. Unfortunately this does not seem to be the case and, as the email lists the Kappa Sigma fraternity as its source, is under investigation by the Kappa Sigma Fraternity nationals.The author of the email celebrates the concept of getting a woman drunk for the purposes of taking advantage of her. He calls it loop n doop and cautions potential cocksmen to Be careful with loop n doops, because too much loop and they will get sick and be useless entities. Entities. Not people. Entities.
The worst part about this email, to me at least, is that the author is fully aware of what rape culture is and advises his fellow cretins on how to use it to their advantage:
Non-consent and rape are two different things. There is a fine line, so make sure not to cross it.
When utilizing the loop power of 4 Lokos, be careful. A target on one 4 Loko is putting the odds in your favor of getting some pie. A target on two 4 Lokos is going to get sick and pass out. A target on three 4 Lokos leads to instances of litigation and lawsuits. Terms like sexual assault seem to be used in this case.
I would love to say He thinks theres no difference between non-consent and rape? Boy, is he in for a surprise when his inevitable court date comes up! But I cant and this piece of dirt knows it. You see, in rape culture, its possible for non-consensual sex to NOT be rape. Was the woman drinking? On drugs? Was she dressed like a whore? Well, then she must have wanted it on some level so it cant possibly be rape even if she was screaming and crying the whole time. See how this works? The author certainly does.
*snip*
Much more at link, including the full sick repulsive email.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/07/usc-fratboy-email-calls-women-targets-declares-giving-them-a-name-is-pointless/
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USC Fratboy Email Calls Women “Targets;” Declares “Giving Them A Name Is Pointless” [View all]
one_voice
Jan 2012
OP
it is a free for all on women. here on du, too. sexism and misogyny has gotten a thumbs up.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#1
i have been saying for too long that we are, and why, and it is a huge issue. we address it or we
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#13
what does that have to do with this issue? divert to talk about all the zillion of men being falsely
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#58
not that there is concern a man does this, but your need to dismiss women, again.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#71
i have seen you dismiss sexist and misogynist behavior in every post. no one should bother with
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#73
i didnt complain about the mens forum. you might be getting confused with a different
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#85
nope? you accuse, know for a fact, but you cant clue me in what you are accusing me of?
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#91
the issue i had before du3 opened was no moderators and a jury system. that has nothing to do with
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#97
"Sex crimes down"--NOT according to MY sources. Please update your information
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#77
Actually, my life got in the way--halfway through my reply to you too.
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#129
My God, if snark were money, you'd be a billionaire. You're blocked. nt
mistertrickster
Jan 2012
#140
Haven't heard that term in 40 years? Time to update your information:
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#79
only 'explanation' ... "that age" once is that the little head is thinking for the big head.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#111
they are not even drooling over her. they are making comments to degrade, dehumanize women
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#17
no i was not saying rape. yes i was saying misogyny. thank you for allowing me to clarify. nt
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#25
college chant ... no means yes. gang rape porn a favorite. where does sisters, mothers
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#26
Dumbass fratboy should read the paper. The term "rape" has been redefined, so to speak.
flvegan
Jan 2012
#29
what i am finding is when it is blatanly presented, how consistently people ignore the issue
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#74
It's amazing that so many people can apparently maintain such a huge blind spot...
redqueen
Jan 2012
#137
+1. yes the nets, for all to see, when applying for a job. i could do without just testosterone
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#41
What a ludicrous post filled with grossly offensive overgeneralizations.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#75
we have a twofer. keep wemmez as virgins, all wemmez is whores for mans play.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#50
FYI, read here including comments at links: http://dailytrojan.com/?s=kappa+sigma+viral+email
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#76
Please see post #114, thanks. Now if you'd posted about this upcoming DVD release, no argument.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#120
This story is nearly a year old. ONE student wrote this (and he was not from USC); it
LeftinOH
Jan 2012
#114
I'm not angry at anyone who isn't invested in minimizing the issue of rape culture.
redqueen
Jan 2012
#145