Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Science versus Academia [View all]
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
8. Peer review usually means several "blind referees" read a proposed article and judge whether it
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 10:28 PM
Jan 2012

meets subjective standards for the journal and field.

If published, experts in the field will continue to examine the conclusions frequently publishing letters or articles rebutting a paper or hopefully replicating the research and reaching similar conclusions.

Criticism never ends as evidenced recently by scientist who published results questioning Einstein's speed of light limit.

That's different from religion which poses questions that cannot be answered by science but reach a conclusion nevertheless and refuse to reconsider whether that conclusion is valid.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Science versus Academia»Reply #8