Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)

10. Yes, as a predictive aide

Reply to Boojatta (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 7, 2012, 10:48 PM

Jan 2012

Professional scientists have done dumb, erroneous and even fraudulant work.

Scientists sometimes reach inaccurate conclusions.

But if a panel of accredited scientists agree that a work is of sufficient rigor to be published as science it is likely that it is science.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Science versus Academia [View all] Boojatta Jan 2012 OP

I think of science as being more a process than anything else.. n/t Fumesucker Jan 2012 #1

I think the scientific method is the key d_r Jan 2012 #2

That's one part of it. Igel Jan 2012 #15

yes I would agree with you d_r Jan 2012 #18

"actually works of science" iff they are published in peer reviewed, scientific journals that are jody Jan 2012 #3

How much peer review are we talking about? Boojatta Jan 2012 #5

Peer review usually means several "blind referees" read a proposed article and judge whether it jody Jan 2012 #8

Not all journals are the same. Please visit "Journal Rankings", link below, and google "ranking jody Jan 2012 #9

No Confusious Jan 2012 #4

The publication in a peer-reviewed foum implies it is science independent of the authors CV cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #6

What about the CVs of the people who conduct the peer review of the paper? Boojatta Jan 2012 #7

Yes, as a predictive aide cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #10

Sorry for intruding but one might not know who reviewed an article. That's at the discretion jody Jan 2012 #11

What is "works of science"? FarCenter Jan 2012 #12

There is a rift between the two. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2012 #13

Wiki can be good. Igel Jan 2012 #14

Well that's exactly the thing, a good Wikipedia article is loaded with good citations. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2012 #16

Scholarshit vs. Scholarship... the eternal struggle... JCMach1 Jan 2012 #17