Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In the dead of night, Trump Admin tried get a ruling that Pres. and VP can be buried at Arlington [View all]Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)26. I still have no problem with it.
A president serves their country. If they allow non-combat veterans, then I see no problem allowing the Commander in Chief of the US military.
And it does appear they're eligible for that reason.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In the dead of night, Trump Admin tried get a ruling that Pres. and VP can be buried at Arlington [View all]
riversedge
Jun 2020
OP
Actually, the OP is wrong. Currently, presidents are allowed to be buried there.
Drunken Irishman
Jun 2020
#49
"People are saying it's a dump. Imagine! 50 foot high red letters! Trump! Improve property values!"
struggle4progress
Jun 2020
#20
That's weird. Trump publicly said that he wanted to be buried at his Bedminster golf club.
no_hypocrisy
Jun 2020
#23
The only Drumpf family members to serve would have been on the cliffs above Normandy beaches
keithbvadu2
Jun 2020
#31
I don't think they should be buried there unless they served. The disruption would be
Tech
Jun 2020
#33
Instead of an eternal flame like on JFK's grave site, he probably wants an eternal flaming cross.
NurseJackie
Jun 2020
#52