Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)

2. You've changed the headline for your own purpose.

Reply to Zalatix (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 06:43 AM

Sep 2012

"The Middle East riots" is a general misexpression in this context given that the article is specific - Libya.

I tried to point out some days back the the attack on your consular official coincided with the protest regarding the film. They were separate issues the former more likely being made to coincide with either 9/11 or the death of Al Q's #2.

Riots elsewhere had everything to do with the film.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Middle East riots were planned in advance. Imagine that, it had nothing to do with a stupid film [View all] Zalatix Sep 2012 OP

You're conflating two things: the protests and the attack. CJCRANE Sep 2012 #1

You've changed the headline for your own purpose. dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #2

Susan Rice directly contradicts that so I guess that is the US position. It's all due to the movie. dkf Sep 2012 #3

She implied that the protests were used as an opportunistic cover for the attack. CJCRANE Sep 2012 #5

Care to quote where she contradicts that? Zalatix Sep 2012 #6

Ambassador Susan Rice: Libya Attack Not Premeditated Fla_Democrat Sep 2012 #7

Whatever, the fact that the film is playing into their hands Live and Learn Sep 2012 #4