Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Joe Biden for president. He's not a whiney b****." [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(26,958 posts)99. I will never understand why people who think using misogynistic slurs to attack a truly
contemptible person don't go all the way and use racist and homophobic slurs, too. Why stop at halfway? If you've already accepted "they go low, we go high" doesn't work, why not bring out the big guns?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bastard is a moralistic slur rather than a gendered term. Bitch is gendered, inextricably.
Caliman73
Jun 2020
#126
I agree. Thanks. We have so many very good ones that apply brilliantly. We do not need to jab at
LizBeth
Jun 2020
#7
Nah. As a Democrat I am not throwing out a sexist jab to score some points, while being cool.
LizBeth
Jun 2020
#6
It certainly allows the engagement of self-righteous sanctimony. So there is that...
LanternWaste
Jun 2020
#37
That's correct. It has neither gay slurs nor racial slurs and is a well made video.
PTWB
Jun 2020
#34
Fine. If you don't think it has a place here then there are ways to deal with it. Have at it!
George II
Jun 2020
#45
You seem to like asking questions like "did you stop beating your wife/husband/partner yet?"
George II
Jun 2020
#53
Again, imagine my surprise when I opened up this thread and saw you questioning another poster.
PTWB
Jun 2020
#58
Imagine my surprise when I saw you say you were "participating" in the thread and yet....
George II
Jun 2020
#59
Well, technically he only acknowledged that they weren't present. I suppose he didn't condemn them.
PTWB
Jun 2020
#63
Why are YOU asking me to answer that question, it wasn't asked by you.....or was it?
George II
Jun 2020
#73
Yes, the answer to my last question is becoming increasingly clear. BTW, when I was growing up....
George II
Jun 2020
#75
I know you obsess about where I've lived over my lifetime, we've been through this before:
George II
Jun 2020
#78
Of course you knew that - perhaps you should fine tune your cataloging system and cross references?
George II
Jun 2020
#81
If you object to the use of "they" as a pronoun for a person of unknown gender
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2020
#89
Or you were responding to someone who just uses "they" when it's not known
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2020
#94
I suspect "George" is a huge clue, and the person I responded to hangs on every word...
George II
Jun 2020
#95
"George II" is a historical figure. So, no, it's no clue, since you're not a dead king.
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2020
#96
That historical figure was a male (btw, there were two, both males), and George II...
George II
Jun 2020
#97
Yes indeed - in response to a subthread in which I was involved and you responded (surprisingly?)...
George II
Jun 2020
#109
Life sure can be a ............... oh, you know what I mean. Maybe I should say....
George II
Jun 2020
#134
I posted an article to show the context of the BJG tweet everyone was fake-outraged about
melman
Jun 2020
#136
Oh, I know...I dont like it on the phone. And going OT for a little bit, you would
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2020
#164
C'mon man. Yesterday it was "said individual", today it's "Senator you-know-who"....
George II
Jun 2020
#22
It is. Why post something about someone if you're not willing to say who it is?
George II
Jun 2020
#26
Back to that irrelevant and hypothetical question based on a false premise from days ago? And....
George II
Jun 2020
#39
You know what's funny? That is a really well put together video, 1:35 long, and some are dwelling..
George II
Jun 2020
#57
There's a title and a still picture in the OP that are exclusively about calling him a "bitch"
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2020
#88
Over the years that word (I never use it online or in real life) has become gender neutral...
George II
Jun 2020
#90
It's "gender neutral" in application, but the reason it's held to be insulting
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2020
#93
I will never understand why people who think using misogynistic slurs to attack a truly
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2020
#99