Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,426 posts)
34. Unfortunately, there are a lot of health conditions
Mon Jun 22, 2020, 04:02 PM
Jun 2020

that don't ostensibly impact health until they are too late to cure. That's the point of regular doctor's visits - to catch things while they can make a difference.

And - far too many doctors cause problems with the recommended treatment partly because they expect patients to be non-compliant (perhaps even with keeping regular appoints). So they over-medicate - and figure they can give you more medication to counter the damage done by the first. My doctor is currently hot on the all-diabetics-should-be-on-statins kick. I'm not personally at the risk level where it makes sense for me to take statins (even with treating diabetes as a separate risk factor, which it is). Statins although they are extremely effective at lowering the bad cholesterol, they also prevent production of lots of other things the body actually needs (which can result in side effects such as dementia, hardening of the arteries, depression, muscle loss/impairment (including to the heart muscles)). But - that needs to be monitored, since diabetes is generally considered a chronic progressive disease. I'd be just fine not seeing the doctor (in connection with diabetes) as regularly . . . until I was suddenly not fine because - absent monitoring - I shifted from not being a good candidate for statins to being one who should be on a high dose.

If I'm not seeing a doctor regularly - statins make more sense because they help head off the big dramatic risk (and they can supplement with the other things statins block productions of (like horomones, coenzyme Q10) and medicate me for depression if it results. Off statins, however, I need the regular visits to determine at what point my need for statins changes, if it does.

That said, I'm in favor of allowing telemedicine to replace many actual visits. I did two during the period of closures (One cancer check-up - post mammogram and breast exam by a different member of the team. Absolutely no reason for an in-person check up every 3 months now than I'm 4 years out from an uneventful initial treatment. One for a second degree burn with no apparent complications.) My daughter did one (flu - rule out COVID 19 prior to testing availability) and my spouse did one (discuss routine bloodwork); Even if doctors charge the same, it minimizes inconvenience for all concerned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The 3rd leading cause of death in this country, behind cancer and heart disease, is medical error. sop Jun 2020 #1
Is that really true? SlogginThroughIt Jun 2020 #28
Links: sop Jun 2020 #32
There's an old axiom that 70 - 80% of medical problems are self-limited and will resolve themselves. Hoyt Jun 2020 #2
No. That's about right. In fact, my Adult Medicine instructor in PA School said it was closer to 90% Aristus Jun 2020 #3
I originally said 80%, but was concerned I'd get bashed by those you describe. Hoyt Jun 2020 #4
Chronic problems are completely baffling to medicine. They treat a number and create other problems lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #8
Getting a prescription for antibiotics exboyfil Jun 2020 #11
Certainly makes life easier, but for things like strep, etc., vast majority will survive. Hoyt Jun 2020 #13
Heart damage a big risk factor from strep exboyfil Jun 2020 #17
So is kidney failure, which is how Emily Dickinson died--it's called Bright's Disease. tblue37 Jun 2020 #25
I cannot remember the last time I needed antibiotics. Tipperary Jun 2020 #23
I got an antibiotic prescription for a UTI early in lockdown. Crunchy Frog Jun 2020 #29
The last City we lived in, Wellstone ruled Jun 2020 #5
I've lived in a number of places stopdiggin Jun 2020 #27
Yeah... I think i'll continue with preventative medicine... Ohio Joe Jun 2020 #6
I agree Ohiogal Jun 2020 #10
Quote: admittedly ... "some patients" had "terrible health consequences" Tetrachloride Jun 2020 #7
So sorry to hear this :( DarthDem Jun 2020 #22
Ty. I appreciate it. Tetrachloride Jun 2020 #26
The co-pay with my insurance Ohiogal Jun 2020 #9
No! I used to think that. Grins Jun 2020 #20
Thank you for your concern Ohiogal Jun 2020 #24
Republicans have been saying that for years... stillcool Jun 2020 #12
We could save a lot MoonlitKnight Jun 2020 #14
The consequences of poor preventive care are not going to be seen in 3 to 4 months. unitedwethrive Jun 2020 #15
Pediatricians are very worried about the consequences of delayed vaccinations unitedwethrive Jun 2020 #16
If the kids are socially isolating, it's unlikely that there will be a problem. Crunchy Frog Jun 2020 #30
This assumes strict, long-term social isolation, which I agree would work, but even having a parent unitedwethrive Jun 2020 #31
While some things do need care, a lot of other things PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2020 #18
IMO, the elephants in the room are neglect of mental health care and.... KY_EnviroGuy Jun 2020 #19
The question is, are these people really fine or sarisataka Jun 2020 #21
Fucking liar ... GeorgeGist Jun 2020 #33
Unfortunately, there are a lot of health conditions Ms. Toad Jun 2020 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People Have Stopped Going...»Reply #34