Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,893 posts)
14. I don't think Gabbard was in office for the votes
Fri Jun 26, 2020, 05:09 AM
Jun 2020

Last edited Fri Jun 26, 2020, 05:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Barbara Lee

AUMF opposition Edit
Lee gained national attention in 2001 as the only member of congress to vote "No" on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF), stating that she voted no not because she opposed military action but because she believed the AUMF, as written, granted overly-broad powers to wage war to the president at a time when the facts regarding the situation were not yet clear. She "warned her colleagues to be 'careful not to embark on an open-ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target'".[12]

Lee explained,

"It was a blank check to the president to attack anyone involved in the September 11 events—anywhere, in any country, without regard to our nation's long-term foreign policy, economic and national security interests, and without time limit. In granting these overly broad powers, the Congress failed its responsibility to understand the dimensions of its declaration. I could not support such a grant of war-making authority to the president; I believe it would put more innocent lives at risk. The president has the constitutional authority to protect the nation from further attack, and he has mobilized the armed forces to do just that. The Congress should have waited for the facts to be presented and then acted with fuller knowledge of the consequences of our action".[13]

This vote made nationwide news reports and brought about a large and extremely polarized response, with the volume of calls gridlocking the switchboard of her Capitol Hill office. Although it appears to have reflected the beliefs of the majority of her constituents, the majority of responses from elsewhere in the nation were angry and hostile, some referring to her as "communist" and "traitor". Many of the responses included death threats against her or her family to the point that the Capitol Police provided round-the-clock plainclothes bodyguards.[13] She was also criticized by politicians and in editorial pages of conservative-leaning newspapers, e.g. John Fund's column in The Wall Street Journal.[14] She was awarded the Seán MacBride Peace Prize by the International Peace Bureau in 2002 for that vote.

In her speech, she quoted the Rev. Nathan D. Baxter, dean of National Cathedral: "As we act, let us not become the evil that we deplore."[15]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lee

She obviously isn't scared of Republican ads. She has been through a lot worse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Defund tRump. marybourg Jun 2020 #1
Seriously? murielm99 Jun 2020 #2
Not really JonLP24 Jun 2020 #3
...which is not "defunding" brooklynite Jun 2020 #16
What do you think Barbara Lee means? JonLP24 Jun 2020 #17
I don't CARE what she "means". brooklynite Jun 2020 #18
Defund the police is a local issue and several cities are following suit JonLP24 Jun 2020 #20
Which is not "defunding". brooklynite Jun 2020 #21
"I don't CARE what she "means"." melman Jun 2020 #24
So you think Biden should advocate a losing policy? brooklynite Jun 2020 #33
Loaded question melman Jun 2020 #34
Yes melman Jun 2020 #7
Any candidate trading in the word "Defund" needs to be De-selected. It's an incredibly inappropriate OnDoutside Jun 2020 #4
Barbara Lee is great JonLP24 Jun 2020 #5
Gabbard ? OnDoutside Jun 2020 #13
I don't think Gabbard was in office for the votes JonLP24 Jun 2020 #14
It's actually good and right melman Jun 2020 #6
For Republican ads perhaps, otherwise self inflicted stupidity, but OnDoutside Jun 2020 #12
Uh melman Jun 2020 #23
You should be thankful they're on our side this time, one can only OnDoutside Jun 2020 #25
They're not on our side melman Jun 2020 #29
They want Joe Biden as President, and want the Democrats to win the Senate as well OnDoutside Jun 2020 #30
Rick Wilson's greatest hits melman Jun 2020 #31
They're nasty feckers, but are taking it to Trump & Republicans EVERY single day. The best the far OnDoutside Jun 2020 #32
trump and the republicans are already using this as a campaign issue. Most of us have started.... George II Jun 2020 #22
Exactly. You have to wonder sometimes whether those who think OnDoutside Jun 2020 #38
the core mistake that politicians make, imho, is worrying how their words mopinko Jun 2020 #35
No, words matter, and the connotation of defund is less money for OnDoutside Jun 2020 #36
they are picking up the people's words. that always wins. mopinko Jun 2020 #39
That's activists words, not "people's" words. The people spoke in March when they gave a resounding OnDoutside Jun 2020 #40
YES!!!! The Pentagon budget is one of the biggest reasons we can't have nice things. (nt) scarletwoman Jun 2020 #8
There's always money for bombs Bettie Jun 2020 #27
It could definitely use some "fat trimming". smirkymonkey Jun 2020 #9
Incredibly poor timing on Ms. Lee's part, IMO. KY_EnviroGuy Jun 2020 #10
Blame it on the cops who killed George Floyd JonLP24 Jun 2020 #11
Excellent reasoning. murielm99 Jun 2020 #15
+1 ProfessorGAC Jun 2020 #19
Yep, don't say it, do it. You have to wonder about the motivations OnDoutside Jun 2020 #37
There is a lot of that budget that could be Bettie Jun 2020 #26
We spend what the next 7 countries do COMBINED SoonerPride Jun 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Barbara Lee: Defund the P...»Reply #14