Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CatWoman

(80,230 posts)
Fri Jun 26, 2020, 01:39 PM Jun 2020

Appeals court rules funding for Trump border wall construction 'unlawful' [View all]

The Trump administration can't use money that Congress appropriated for military projects to build the wall, the appeals court ruled.

The Trump administration does not have the authority to use military funding to pay for construction of a border wall, a federal appeals court panel ruled on Friday.

In a 2-1 ruling, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that diverting $2.5 billion Congress had appropriated for the military violated the Constitution and is unlawful.

The executive branch "lacked independent constitutional authority to authorize the transfer of funds," the ruling said. "These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause.' Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."

The decision upheld a ruling by a federal judge in California who last year found that the Trump administration's funding scheme was against the law.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/appeals-court-rules-funding-trump-border-wall-construction-unlawful-n1232287?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma&fbclid=IwAR3nqCz3r1qaoIOxGbxRgX5mQ0sz9kDh5vR0CxCyqy0SVJJ5UWcXZi1ky4Y

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GREAT NEWS! bluestarone Jun 2020 #1
More winning! Pacifist Patriot Jun 2020 #2
K & R malaise Jun 2020 #3
The Constitution was designed to protect the nation procon Jun 2020 #4
Can't be happy about that Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 #5
Ha ha ha! smirkymonkey Jun 2020 #6
FAKE COURT! Newest Reality Jun 2020 #7
Without clicking through, was the lone dissenter a trump/repug appointee? erronis Jun 2020 #8
2015....This should have been an Obama appointee Bettie Jun 2020 #9
Every judge rammed through by Moscow Mitch needs to be investigated. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2020 #10
Glenn Kirschner tells us how to get rid of those unqualified judges CatWoman Jun 2020 #19
Thanks for the link! I missed that one. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2020 #21
No Surprise that the dissenter is a Trump appointee martouf Jun 2020 #12
Hey - welcome to the discussion. I've never met anybody on their first post. erronis Jun 2020 #15
Every judge put on any bench by Moscow Mitch has to go, and everybody Eliot Rosewater Jun 2020 #20
Good news! gademocrat7 Jun 2020 #11
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! fleur-de-lisa Jun 2020 #13
lacked independent constitutional authority lindysalsagal Jun 2020 #14
The Supreme Court had lifted the California's judge's stay until appeals were finished. Lonestarblue Jun 2020 #16
⭐️⭐️⭐️K&R ⭐️⭐️⭐️ spanone Jun 2020 #17
Too late. He's already destroyed protected areas of the Sonoran Desert for his wall. Saguaros in2herbs Jun 2020 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals court rules fundi...