Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GREAT NEWS! bluestarone Jun 2020 #1
More winning! Pacifist Patriot Jun 2020 #2
K & R malaise Jun 2020 #3
The Constitution was designed to protect the nation procon Jun 2020 #4
Can't be happy about that Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 #5
Ha ha ha! smirkymonkey Jun 2020 #6
FAKE COURT! Newest Reality Jun 2020 #7
Without clicking through, was the lone dissenter a trump/repug appointee? erronis Jun 2020 #8
2015....This should have been an Obama appointee Bettie Jun 2020 #9
Every judge rammed through by Moscow Mitch needs to be investigated. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2020 #10
Glenn Kirschner tells us how to get rid of those unqualified judges CatWoman Jun 2020 #19
Thanks for the link! I missed that one. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2020 #21
No Surprise that the dissenter is a Trump appointee martouf Jun 2020 #12
Hey - welcome to the discussion. I've never met anybody on their first post. erronis Jun 2020 #15
Every judge put on any bench by Moscow Mitch has to go, and everybody Eliot Rosewater Jun 2020 #20
Good news! gademocrat7 Jun 2020 #11
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! fleur-de-lisa Jun 2020 #13
lacked independent constitutional authority lindysalsagal Jun 2020 #14
The Supreme Court had lifted the California's judge's stay until appeals were finished. Lonestarblue Jun 2020 #16
⭐️⭐️⭐️K&R ⭐️⭐️⭐️ spanone Jun 2020 #17
Too late. He's already destroyed protected areas of the Sonoran Desert for his wall. Saguaros in2herbs Jun 2020 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals court rules fundi...»Reply #11