Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

genxlib

(6,177 posts)
7. I am surely in the minority here
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jun 2020

But that number does not hit my outrage button.

To have a real opinion I would need to have a much better idea of the development costs and the share covered by the government.

I would prefer it to be less but realistically, I didn't hate this number. If it is truly life saving, it is hard to put a value on that. But even on an economic scale, the early studies showed an average of leaving the hospital four days earlier. That has an actual value that is far beyond the cost of the medicine itself. Based on what it cost to be in a hospital ICU, it is likely a substantial cost savings on average.

Our system is totally out of whack and we desperately need something better. But I don't think this is the worst case I have seen.

Go ahead. Flame me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gilead's $2,340 price for...»Reply #7