Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brush

(61,033 posts)
10. You must've missed the photo. They vilified themselves when they...
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:38 PM
Jun 2020

brandished firearms at innocent, protesters passing by. That's a crime in many jurisdictions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so we are going to vilify people because they live in such areas? Is that what we do now? beachbumbob Jun 2020 #1
hmm... Alacritous Crier Jun 2020 #4
I'm on board with that. yardwork Jun 2020 #20
I'm fine with vilifying folks who behave as this couple behaved. PTWB Jun 2020 #6
It's never a bad time to dig into the racist history of property development and what it means for WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2020 #9
You must've missed the photo. They vilified themselves when they... brush Jun 2020 #10
They weren't protecting their (not-threatened) home Bettie Jun 2020 #11
bravo SiliconValley_Dem Jun 2020 #31
that's what you took from this? You missed the point. That's not why they are villified. TeamPooka Jun 2020 #12
From the article: Cirque du So-What Jun 2020 #13
Wow. Segregationists in perpetuity. oasis Jun 2020 #19
Do you always confuse observation and mere mocking with actual vilification? LanternWaste Jun 2020 #14
You're going to defend them?... SidDithers Jun 2020 #16
I will think they were vilified for assholeish behavior. yellowcanine Jun 2020 #22
If they live in those places AND they aim guns at peaceful protesters on their way pnwmom Jun 2020 #23
hahaha! yep. and rightly so SiliconValley_Dem Jun 2020 #30
Fuck yes. They clearly don't pay enough taxes, wealth, income, estate, etc. Alex4Martinez Jun 2020 #36
Pays to be rich....filthy rich. Nice if you can afford it. jmg257 Jun 2020 #2
The bar association wryter2000 Jun 2020 #3
I don't know if it's a felony but here is at least one possibly applicable Missouri Statute BamaRefugee Jun 2020 #7
She definitely pointed hers at people wryter2000 Jun 2020 #8
The statute doesn't require pointing a weapon, just exhibiting it BamaRefugee Jun 2020 #17
So are the streets and sidewalks public property? I saw no signs posted at that gate that stated it BamaRefugee Jun 2020 #5
Wow! I used google earth street view to take a walk around the huge perimeter. PaulRevere08 Jun 2020 #15
Really, Gated communities and doorman and guard protected buildings are not that rare in America. rgbecker Jun 2020 #18
Tell me, how many strangers do you welcome knocking on your door? brooklynite Jun 2020 #24
They don't seem to feel too safe. cwydro Jun 2020 #26
Explain? brooklynite Jun 2020 #27
Perhaps I didn't understand your post. cwydro Jun 2020 #28
My point is that people don't all live in doorman apartments or "communities" for "safety" brooklynite Jun 2020 #38
Welcome? Not generally Bettie Jun 2020 #34
If I had the money they seem to have. cwydro Jun 2020 #21
St. Louis is a great city. why di you have to diss that great American location? SiliconValley_Dem Jun 2020 #32
I see people dis the south all the time on this forum. cwydro Jun 2020 #33
Jeez, Not even a hint of why not? rgbecker Jun 2020 #35
These people give me something to go on lol. cwydro Jun 2020 #37
the Veiled Prophet of Khorassan Celerity Jun 2020 #25
The author is a little overly dramatic, but yes, gated communities are about keeping people out. aikoaiko Jun 2020 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gun-waving St. Louis coup...»Reply #10