Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(18,256 posts)

1. was based on "demonstrably fraudulent" financial information and should be held invalid.

Sat Jul 4, 2020, 01:36 PM

Jul 2020

I concur. If the content was “demonstrably fraudulent” then the NDA is also “demonstrably fraudulent”

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's niece says 2001 NDA based on 'fraudulent' financial information [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP

GOTTA show his taxes!! bluestarone Jul 2020 #2

Simon & Shuster have already won. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #3

Exactly! & with trump.. something is Always Fraudulent. Cha Jul 2020 #4