Why Ron Paul attracts some liberals.

[joshcryer]

146. It was implied. Get it?

Even if you didn't intend it, you made a generalization. Generalizations have implications. I asked and you have repeatedly fervently denied it. Fair enough. The implication is still there in your post unless you edit it to add an exception, like "except DU." But, of course, I don't expect that because "there is nothing wrong with that." And you're, ultimately, happy with the implication. If I said something that was implied, but not intended, I would correct it as soon as possible, as I prefer to be blunt and not leave implications hanging in my posts. Implications can be read in to, and I like people to know exactly where I stand.

We've been going back and forth about how I am wrong for making a factual, logical, observation.

But it's good to know, in the end, you're against that sort of discourse. One of the largest issues in progressive circles is we're too timid to take the fight to the fascists. We try to keep it civil and let them control the narrative as they have for so long. No more.

I will continue being critical of Ron Paul and supporting detractors if they're not "behaving a certain way."