Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)

10. They could try to move but if they skip out owing back rent they might have trouble

Reply to MichMan (Reply #9)

Sat Jul 4, 2020, 01:41 PM

Jul 2020

passing the background check that most landlords require when they are looking for a new place. And they would take a big hit on their credit score. And doing that would be unethical, especially if your landlord depends on your rent payment to make their mortgage payment on the apartment or house. Many landlords are small operations that depend on timely rent payments to stay above water.

And regarding mortgages, it depends on the fine print. In some cases it could be tacked on the end but in other cases you might only have a short period of time to get caught up or you could face foreclosure.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Eviction crisis': Housing advocates fear waves of homelessness as moratoriums expire [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP

And the republicans refuse to extend the $600 unemployment when MILLIONS are still out of work. BComplex Jul 2020 #1

Because it shouldn't be extended Calculating Jul 2020 #3

That's bassackwards. The people working SHOULD be making more than they're making. BComplex Jul 2020 #4

+1 Cal Carpenter Jul 2020 #8

I understand what you are saying but I think a better approach would be to be sure that totodeinhere Jul 2020 #5

I'm sure those people staying at home onethatcares Jul 2020 #15

I'm fine with extending the benefits at a lower number Calculating Jul 2020 #18

There was a Republican amendment voted down that would have capped UE at 100% of a person's wages Massacure Jul 2020 #19

And the problem is that most of those moratoriums do not cancel either rent or mortgage payments. totodeinhere Jul 2020 #2

I understand how they can make people pay for back mortgage payments MichMan Jul 2020 #9

They could try to move but if they skip out owing back rent they might have trouble totodeinhere Jul 2020 #10

Anyone behind now is likely going to be evicted when the prohibition is eventually lifted madville Jul 2020 #11

Sad but true. We definitely need more government intervention in this area. totodeinhere Jul 2020 #16

Friends i Denver and LA have told me that there are already hundreds of people living in the streets randr Jul 2020 #6

I had no idea! Where is the reporting indeed!! Rachel Maddow has a web site where we can report BComplex Jul 2020 #12

And of course the homeless may find it difficult to socially distance so covi-19 is running totodeinhere Jul 2020 #17

Republicans I_UndergroundPanther Jul 2020 #7

Hear! Hear! BComplex Jul 2020 #13

You are welcome BComplex I_UndergroundPanther Jul 2020 #14