Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

beastie boy

(13,283 posts)

5. It may be a bluff, and they can't prove fraud in NDA. But will Trump call their bluff?

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Jul 4, 2020, 03:00 PM

Jul 2020

Very unlikely. One thing is for certain: if he does not call his niece out on allegations of fraud, it's a sure sign her allegations have basis in fact. And if he does, his tax returns or other documents will likely expose multiple, if unrelated, instances of fraud. A lose-lose for the lying scumbag.

Great gambit by her lawyers!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's niece says 2001 NDA based on 'fraudulent' financial information [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP

was based on "demonstrably fraudulent" financial information and should be held invalid. MagickMuffin Jul 2020 #1

GOTTA show his taxes!! bluestarone Jul 2020 #2

Simon & Shuster have already won. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #3

Exactly! & with trump.. something is Always Fraudulent. Cha Jul 2020 #4

It may be a bluff, and they can't prove fraud in NDA. But will Trump call their bluff? beastie boy Jul 2020 #5