Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who should be next on Mt. Rushmore? [View all]Aristus
(72,064 posts)46. There is no 'next' on Mt. Rushmore. It's not the National Portrait Gallery.
Put in your time, and get your mug carved in rock.
Hell no.
More and more, I'm coming to see the sculpture as a desecration of sacred land.
Since there's no way to undo it, I will accept it as a monumental, and not entirely appropriate, tribute to some iconic American statesmen. But there should be no more faces carved on the mountain. Even Barack Obama, whom I admire beyond the power of words to describe.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Black Hills area of South Dakota is one of the most beautiful places I've seen
HotTeaBag
Jul 2020
#56
I have several very annoying features on this machine, including a very weird spellcheck,
niyad
Jul 2020
#60
The Six Grandfathers Mt. Is sacred to the Oglala Lakota Sioux. We have no more right to
niyad
Jul 2020
#62