Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(30,044 posts)
48. I hate these comparisons to the Taliban
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 04:17 PM
Jul 2020

The ideology of those sects they twist no idolatry to mean prevent idolatry.

Saudi Arabia Bulldozes Over Its Heritage

Though the Saudi rulers have a long history of destroying historical sites, activists say the pace and range of destruction has recently increased. A few months ago, the house of Hamza, the Prophet Muhammad’s uncle, was flattened to make way for a Meccan hotel, according to Irfan Al Alawi, executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation. There have even been rumored threats to Muhammad’s tomb in Medina and his birthplace in Mecca.



A 61-page report, published recently in Saudi Arabia’s Journal of the Royal Presidency, suggested separating the Prophet’s tomb from Medina’s mosque, a task “that would amount to its destruction,” Alawi says. “You can’t move it without destroying it.” Moreover, he alleges, plans for a new palace for King Abdullah threaten the library atop the site traditionally identified as the birthplace of Muhammad. Even now, signs in four languages warn visitors that there is no proof that the Prophet Muhammad was born there, “so it is forbidden to make this place specific for praying, supplicating or get [sic] blessing.”

Wahhabism, the prevailing Saudi strain of Islam, frowns on visits to shrines, tombs or religio-historical sites, on grounds that they might lead to Islam’s gravest sin: worshipping anyone other than God. In recent years, the twin forks of Wahhabi doctrine and urban development have speared most physical reminders of Islamic history in the heart of Mecca. The house of the Prophet’s first wife, Khadijah has made way for public toilets. A Hilton hotel stands on the site of the house of Islam’s first caliph, Abu Bakr. Famously, the Kaaba now stands in the shade of one of the world’s tallest buildings, the Mecca Royal Clock Tower, part of a complex built by the Bin Laden Group, boasting a 5-story shopping mall, luxury hotels and a parking garage.

Saudi officials did not respond to interview requests, but in the past, they have said that the expansion project is necessary to cater to the ever-growing number of pilgrims to Saudi Arabia, a number forecast to reach 17 million by 2025. When it’s done, the expansion of the mataf, the area where the faithful circumambulate around the Kaaba, will treble its capacity, to 150,000 people; the Great Mosque will be able to hold 2.5 million.

https://time.com/3584585/saudi-arabia-bulldozes-over-its-heritage/

I could explain more in detail but it isn't worth it. Apples & Oranges.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think we should leave it up to the locals with what to do with the mountain JonLP24 Jul 2020 #1
None of the above. Shave it down to bare rock leftieNanner Jul 2020 #2
+1 2naSalit Jul 2020 #6
Agree Nt spooky3 Jul 2020 #15
This. CrispyQ Jul 2020 #18
my thoughts have evolved to this position as well RT Atlanta Jul 2020 #19
There you go. dchill Jul 2020 #20
Yes. LakeArenal Jul 2020 #21
*This* essme Jul 2020 #24
+1000 Newest Reality Jul 2020 #29
+10000000 nt csziggy Jul 2020 #33
Can't get on board with that... lame54 Jul 2020 #34
Yeah. Maybe not the shaving down part leftieNanner Jul 2020 #35
I am curious genxlib Jul 2020 #42
Although I lived near there and heard of the monument... lame54 Jul 2020 #44
I confess my family took me there when I was a kid genxlib Jul 2020 #45
I hate these comparisons to the Taliban JonLP24 Jul 2020 #48
What are they going to build in South Dakota?... lame54 Jul 2020 #50
I wouldn't do anything to it JonLP24 Jul 2020 #51
The Black Hills area of South Dakota is one of the most beautiful places I've seen HotTeaBag Jul 2020 #56
+1 mantis49 Jul 2020 #37
Indeed. And with a big apology. To people, to the earth. jeffreyi Jul 2020 #41
Exactly, thanks. txwhitedove Jul 2020 #47
Ding ding ding! Mossfern Jul 2020 #49
+1 GeorgeGist Jul 2020 #52
this Voltaire2 Jul 2020 #55
I would not be in favor of desecrating that site any more than PaulRevere08 Jul 2020 #3
No one. diddlysquat Jul 2020 #4
No one. llmart Jul 2020 #5
No-one Spider Jerusalem Jul 2020 #7
Nobody. They've already studied it and determined The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #8
That's very interesting info. Mike 03 Jul 2020 #13
How about we just leave it alone? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 #9
plus 1000 JenniferJuniper Jul 2020 #11
I concur! Greywing Jul 2020 #61
Red Cloud. dflprincess Jul 2020 #10
Have you gone the 17 miles to see Crazy Horse? MyOwnPeace Jul 2020 #27
The Lakota are divided about the Crazy Horse monument dflprincess Jul 2020 #32
Interesting - thank you! MyOwnPeace Jul 2020 #43
Nobody. Give The Six Grandfathers back to the Indigenous peoples. niyad Jul 2020 #12
+2 (one for each point made) flibbitygiblets Jul 2020 #17
Uh-Oh.... quickesst Jul 2020 #40
I have several very annoying features on this machine, including a very weird spellcheck, niyad Jul 2020 #60
I have to be careful.... quickesst Jul 2020 #65
Nobody Siwsan Jul 2020 #14
No one. It is not ours to decide anyway. cayugafalls Jul 2020 #16
No one. There's no place to put another face due to unstable rock formations Budi Jul 2020 #22
We should try to return it to it's natural beauty. PTWB Jul 2020 #23
Let it revert back to nature gollygee Jul 2020 #25
Stop vandalizing sacred Native lands NightWatcher Jul 2020 #26
Father Guido Sarducci. The Wizard Jul 2020 #28
"finda the Popa inna the pizza." leftieNanner Jul 2020 #30
Nobody...tear the whole monstrosity down greenjar_01 Jul 2020 #31
The Six Grandfathers Mt. Is sacred to the Oglala Lakota Sioux. We have no more right to niyad Jul 2020 #62
No one. Caliman73 Jul 2020 #36
Just leave as is bdamomma Jul 2020 #38
Never again alphafemale Jul 2020 #39
There is no 'next' on Mt. Rushmore. It's not the National Portrait Gallery. Aristus Jul 2020 #46
The thing should be blown up. Tom Traubert Jul 2020 #53
Welcome to DU. How do you figure that blowing up a sacred mountain will return it to niyad Jul 2020 #63
I'm not a demolition or restoration expert. Tom Traubert Jul 2020 #66
Funny. Your post started with Blow it up". niyad Jul 2020 #67
Wouldn't you agree that . . . Tom Traubert Jul 2020 #69
Give it back to the Native Americans. That monument is on stolen land. backscatter712 Jul 2020 #54
Cary Grant First Speaker Jul 2020 #57
The monument encroaches on tribal land in violation of treaties Jersey Devil Jul 2020 #58
Rock. hunter Jul 2020 #59
No one misanthrope Jul 2020 #64
Yeah what many have said, stolen land. Give it back. yellowcanine Jul 2020 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who should be next on Mt....»Reply #48