Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How can a disease with a 1% mortality rate shut down the U.S? Answered by Franklin Veaux: [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)12. Basically agree, but with a few quibbles or slight bit of optimism.
It assumes everyone is going to get it and no effective treatments are developed.
If that is true, about all any government can do is flatten the curve so that health system is not totally overwhelmed and effective treatments can be developed.
Could probably argue the hospitalizations are high based upon evidence to date. Also suspect those with permanent health issues are not additive, in that most of the unfortunate people will have heart, lung, AND other conditions.
In any event, its devastating. But, I think well survive, although with drastic change.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How can a disease with a 1% mortality rate shut down the U.S? Answered by Franklin Veaux: [View all]
ehrnst
Jul 2020
OP
Shocking. Quick estimate of victims with permanent disabilities is staggering.
empedocles
Jul 2020
#6
Also, I'd assume that the rate will be higher if the hospitals become inundated,
Crunchy Frog
Jul 2020
#16
...on top of that, people will also die from other conditions who otherwise wouldn't.
subterranean
Jul 2020
#83
I'd like to see primary sources rather than some "quora" editor. I know he cites a few articles but
erronis
Jul 2020
#20
Thats long term, just had a friend released from the hospital after 3 mos...
Historic NY
Jul 2020
#34
It's 4.2% of discovered cases. Actual cases may be 5 to 10 greater in number, hence about 1%. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2020
#61
Not really. That's based on confirmed cases by testing. Many more infected who are never tested.
Hoyt
Jul 2020
#50
I see your point. But your assumption, unless I read it wrong, in which case I apologize
GulfCoast66
Jul 2020
#74
As a sample size grow larger, statistic taken from it more match a full population.
Blue_true
Jul 2020
#106
Hong Kong, one of the countries in the world with the best control of the virus
Blue_true
Jul 2020
#112
Every position that a person can take on this depends upon a lot of supposition,
Blue_true
Jul 2020
#72
So as of right now there are 137,765 known deaths in the US caused by Trump's incompetence
krispos42
Jul 2020
#42
And yet we're currently being led by a guy who can't spell or understand basic math.
Initech
Jul 2020
#47
This is wrong. It assumes everyone will get it, it will be less tha 50%. Need to cut these estimates
Dream Girl
Jul 2020
#102
Very useful information. A guy I work with is one of those "only 1% die" people, and
liberalla
Jul 2020
#53
The info is to counter "herd immunity" advocates who say let everyone get it and let 1% die. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2020
#62
The thing is, 1% is a hypothetical. The current death total is 4% of the confirmed total.
ancianita
Jul 2020
#97