Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Bookmarking. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #1
K&R with thanks uppityperson Jul 2020 #2
Amazing and frightening information bottomofthehill Jul 2020 #3
Shocking. Quick estimate of victims with permanent disabilities is staggering. empedocles Jul 2020 #6
well thought out dem4decades Jul 2020 #4
Kick and recommend. bronxiteforever Jul 2020 #5
Holy COW Leghorn21 Jul 2020 #7
Great. Bookmarking as well. SoonerPride Jul 2020 #8
In other words VA_Jill Jul 2020 #9
KNR and bokmarking niyad Jul 2020 #10
And all those that survive, with damage will... sheshe2 Jul 2020 #11
That is after many life disabled. nt Blue_true Jul 2020 #68
Basically agree, but with a few quibbles or slight bit of optimism. Hoyt Jul 2020 #12
Yes, they calculations are overstated by a factor of two at a minimum. Dream Girl Jul 2020 #101
Great post and bookmarked yonder Jul 2020 #13
1% is a horrifically high death rate DBoon Jul 2020 #14
Exactly, and it's so preventable too. Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #22
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jul 2020 #15
Also, I'd assume that the rate will be higher if the hospitals become inundated, Crunchy Frog Jul 2020 #16
That's what happened in Wuhan and Italy NickB79 Jul 2020 #35
...on top of that, people will also die from other conditions who otherwise wouldn't. subterranean Jul 2020 #83
+1, uponit7771 Jul 2020 #89
How many Rebl2 Jul 2020 #17
Yes, and that includes everyone who wasn't tested FakeNoose Jul 2020 #95
Venn diagram best case central scrutinizer Jul 2020 #18
Yes that is the way to think about it bucolic_frolic Jul 2020 #19
It will be like the survivors of polio or the thalidomide children csziggy Jul 2020 #32
Except now Covid becomes a pre-existing condition.... Heartstrings Jul 2020 #80
Yes, some suffered neurological damage for decades DBoon Jul 2020 #107
I'd like to see primary sources rather than some "quora" editor. I know he cites a few articles but erronis Jul 2020 #20
The sources are included at the link. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2020 #44
"19 more require hospitalization" Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #21
Thats long term, just had a friend released from the hospital after 3 mos... Historic NY Jul 2020 #34
You'll never see me downplay this pandemic. Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #36
He was the head of the entire county's fire services.. Historic NY Jul 2020 #37
Very sad. Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #38
Regardless of the robustness of these numbers, the premise is sound. patphil Jul 2020 #23
Great post malaise Jul 2020 #24
Isn't the mortality rate closer to 4 or 5 percent? groundloop Jul 2020 #25
I'd look at the "cases that had an outcome" instead. Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #29
That's because the number of actual infections Crunchy Frog Jul 2020 #40
no obamanut2012 Jul 2020 #49
It's 4.2% of discovered cases. Actual cases may be 5 to 10 greater in number, hence about 1%. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2020 #61
Per WHO 20% of afflicted require hospitalization RVN VET71 Jul 2020 #104
I have tried to explain that countless times. Pacifist Patriot Jul 2020 #26
Ya it's not the flu amuse bouche Jul 2020 #27
That's not what the 1% mortality rate means. TheRickles Jul 2020 #28
Good point Kitchari Jul 2020 #51
Massachusetts did a pretty aggressive lockdown, based upon news reports. Blue_true Jul 2020 #70
Until there's a vaccine, up to 100% of us could catch it dickthegrouch Jul 2020 #75
+100000 Celerity Jul 2020 #81
Thank you for this. a la izquierda Jul 2020 #90
80% is probably too high Celerity Jul 2020 #103
The mortality rate is higher NewEnglandAutumn Jul 2020 #30
Not really. That's based on confirmed cases by testing. Many more infected who are never tested. Hoyt Jul 2020 #50
You can't prove your last statement. Blue_true Jul 2020 #71
The consensus among experts is that 10 to 20 times more people have been infected Hoyt Jul 2020 #73
I see your point. But your assumption, unless I read it wrong, in which case I apologize GulfCoast66 Jul 2020 #74
We have some empirical data that inadvertently got produced. Blue_true Jul 2020 #78
Your stats are highly inflated TheRickles Jul 2020 #92
As a sample size grow larger, statistic taken from it more match a full population. Blue_true Jul 2020 #106
An assessment by Stanford epidemiologist Dr. John Ioannidis TheRickles Jul 2020 #110
Others put it higher. Believe what you want to believe. nt Blue_true Jul 2020 #111
Hong Kong, one of the countries in the world with the best control of the virus Blue_true Jul 2020 #112
Somewhere Right Here At DU... ProfessorGAC Jul 2020 #31
A very grim but accurate statement, Professor peggysue2 Jul 2020 #59
Every position that a person can take on this depends upon a lot of supposition, Blue_true Jul 2020 #72
Math. paleotn Jul 2020 #33
Si RiF Jul 2020 #39
Humanism, decency, logic, and math.. Doesn't work on deplorables. EqualityNow Jul 2020 #41
That is not how they see things...entirely. Moostache Jul 2020 #56
So as of right now there are 137,765 known deaths in the US caused by Trump's incompetence krispos42 Jul 2020 #42
And many Democrats were prevented from voting in those states. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2020 #45
Trump Virus RicROC Jul 2020 #76
Recommend BadgerMom Jul 2020 #43
I am sharing this to Facebook WonderGrunion Jul 2020 #46
And yet we're currently being led by a guy who can't spell or understand basic math. Initech Jul 2020 #47
Understand exponential math? irilli_hadenoff Jul 2020 #84
I am also on Quora. warmfeet Jul 2020 #48
This is wrong. It assumes everyone will get it, it will be less tha 50%. Need to cut these estimates Dream Girl Jul 2020 #102
When I hear people say that masks do nothing to prevent the spread Mr.Bill Jul 2020 #52
Very useful information. A guy I work with is one of those "only 1% die" people, and liberalla Jul 2020 #53
K & R N/T w0nderer Jul 2020 #54
Hold on. qwlauren35 Jul 2020 #55
The info is to counter "herd immunity" advocates who say let everyone get it and let 1% die. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2020 #62
What is the mortality rate? Jillgirl Jul 2020 #57
Realize also that there are actually two death rates irilli_hadenoff Jul 2020 #85
Even more complicated is that there are critically ill who recover live love laugh Jul 2020 #86
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2020 #93
Investigate Excess Deaths Jillgirl Jul 2020 #98
He doesn't understand the theorem he cited in #1. Mosby Jul 2020 #58
superb distillation and extrapolation! thank you bringthePaine Jul 2020 #60
Mortality rate equals nr deaths/total cases DeminPennswoods Jul 2020 #63
This is the best explanation of what's going on with covid19 that I've seen Poiuyt Jul 2020 #64
KR& Bookmarking. ms liberty Jul 2020 #65
Superb Cetacea Jul 2020 #66
They won't understand unless it's $ modrepub Jul 2020 #67
Whatever the actual mortality rate is, the fact is that it is lower than Collimator Jul 2020 #69
Truth! chwaliszewski Jul 2020 #77
Quora has some fascinatingly correct information.... Heartstrings Jul 2020 #79
One county here in NM has been as high as 7.5% dead Warpy Jul 2020 #82
Bookmarked.. TY for some harsh reality, ehrsnt! Cha Jul 2020 #87
Thank you. Many people are being so cavalier about this disease. Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2020 #88
And who is this guy exactly? a la izquierda Jul 2020 #91
Exactly right. n/t TheRickles Jul 2020 #99
+1 chia Jul 2020 #105
Those are terrifying numbers. BComplex Jul 2020 #94
Where does 1% come from? JoeDuck Jul 2020 #96
The thing is, 1% is a hypothetical. The current death total is 4% of the confirmed total. ancianita Jul 2020 #97
Dear God... calimary Jul 2020 #100
That is what I said at the very beginning. Caliman73 Jul 2020 #108
And if we 'open up' and overrun the hospitals, the mortality rate will be even higher. nilram Jul 2020 #109
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can a disease with a ...»Reply #66