Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Brilliant insight buried deep within the comments on the Sydney Morning Herald [View all]Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)24. Like Obama did in 2010?
http://articles.marketwatch.com/2010-07-21/economy/30772947_1_dodd-frank-act-obama-signs-volcker-rule
Obama signs sweeping bank-reform bill into law
Law hikes big bank fees but gives regulators much discretion in key areas
July 21, 2010|Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama on Wednesday signed into law the most historic shakeup of the regulation of U.S. banks since the Great Depression, placing new fees and limits on the nation's biggest banks, imposing new restrictions on the $450 trillion derivatives market, and crafting a major new consumer-protection division for mortgage and credit-card products.
"Financial reform is not just good for consumers; it is good for the economy," Obama said at a signing ceremony with dozens of Democratic lawmakers and consumer advocates in attendance. "Passing this bill was no easy task. To get there, we had to overcome the furious lobbying of an array of powerful interest groups and a partisan minority determined to block change."
The approval hands Obama a significant triumph in his effort to rein in Wall Street after the excesses that drove the economy to the brink of collapse in September 2008.
The new law, known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, is named after the legislation's two key sponsors in the House and Senate, the Connecticut Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts.
Obama signs sweeping bank-reform bill into law
Law hikes big bank fees but gives regulators much discretion in key areas
July 21, 2010|Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama on Wednesday signed into law the most historic shakeup of the regulation of U.S. banks since the Great Depression, placing new fees and limits on the nation's biggest banks, imposing new restrictions on the $450 trillion derivatives market, and crafting a major new consumer-protection division for mortgage and credit-card products.
"Financial reform is not just good for consumers; it is good for the economy," Obama said at a signing ceremony with dozens of Democratic lawmakers and consumer advocates in attendance. "Passing this bill was no easy task. To get there, we had to overcome the furious lobbying of an array of powerful interest groups and a partisan minority determined to block change."
The approval hands Obama a significant triumph in his effort to rein in Wall Street after the excesses that drove the economy to the brink of collapse in September 2008.
The new law, known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, is named after the legislation's two key sponsors in the House and Senate, the Connecticut Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Brilliant insight buried deep within the comments on the Sydney Morning Herald [View all]
XemaSab
Sep 2012
OP
The PEOPLE can replace Wall Street. We can run the country and the economy ourselves.
Ken Burch
Sep 2012
#36
Wall Street is a place of exchange. Lots of little folk are in the game now too.
Tigress DEM
Sep 2012
#40
I suppose that you'd rather people who would vote _against_ Romney just abstain then?
Fumesucker
Sep 2012
#11
"Because he is running capitalism" is not a criticism, it is a bit of information
quaker bill
Sep 2012
#16
As long as it is US Policy to represent Capitalism to the world we will have this.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2012
#17
You would think so, wouldn't you? But the fact that we/they haven't yet makes me wonder.
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2012
#20
Even were Rmoney to win, he doesn't get to change the voting system to be like that of corporations
treestar
Sep 2012
#34
Mitt clearly believes that "the people who OWN the country ought to govern it".
Ken Burch
Sep 2012
#35