Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Celerity

(55,130 posts)
Sat Jul 18, 2020, 10:40 PM Jul 2020

Researchers Say Earth Is Headed for "Jaw-Dropping" Population Decline [View all]

"It's extraordinary, we'll have to reorganize societies."

https://futurism.com/global-birth-rates-falling-precipitiously?ref=thefuturist

People around the globe are having way fewer babies. By the year 2100, that might turn into a pretty big problem for humanity — rather than the relief one might expect. If they aren’t already, dozens of countries’ populations will be going into decline in this century, according to a new study published in the Lancet this week. 23 countries are expected to feel this effect intensify, with their populations dropping to half of what they are now by the year 2100.

The global population will peak at 9.7 billion around 2064, according to the new projection, and then drop off to 8.8 billion towards the end of the century. “That’s a pretty big thing; most of the world is transitioning into natural population decline,” Christopher Murray, co-author and researcher at the University of Washington, Seattle, told the BBC. “I think it’s incredibly hard to think this through and recognize how big a thing this is; it’s extraordinary, we’ll have to reorganize societies.”

The reality is that with more women receiving an education and entering the work force, combined with the wide availability of contraception, fertility rates are dropping, sometimes precipitously, around the world — a stark reversal of the baby boom following the Second World War. Countries including Spain, Portugal, and Thailand will have their populations more than halve by the end of the century — “jaw-dropping,” according to Murray.

But aren’t fewer humans better for a ravished world that’s rapidly being drained of its resources? The researchers suggest that there may be fewer babies being born, but any positive consequences for the environment would be offset by the challenges of a rapidly aging population. Much older populations “will create enormous social change,” Murray told the BBC. “Who pays tax in a massively aged world? Who pays for healthcare for the elderly? Who looks after the elderly? Will people still be able to retire from work?” “We need a soft landing,” he added.

snip


Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

https://tinyurl.com/ybadb2q7

snip

Findings

The global TFR in the reference scenario was forecasted to be 1·66 (95% UI 1·33–2·08) in 2100. In the reference scenario, the global population was projected to peak in 2064 at 9·73 billion (8·84–10·9) people and decline to 8·79 billion (6·83–11·8) in 2100. The reference projections for the five largest countries in 2100 were India (1·09 billion [0·72–1·71], Nigeria (791 million [594–1056]), China (732 million [456–1499]), the USA (336 million [248–456]), and Pakistan (248 million [151–427]). Findings also suggest a shifting age structure in many parts of the world, with 2·37 billion (1·91–2·87) individuals older than 65 years and 1·70 billion (1·11–2·81) individuals younger than 20 years, forecasted globally in 2100. By 2050, 151 countries were forecasted to have a TFR lower than the replacement level (TFR <2·1), and 183 were forecasted to have a TFR lower than replacement by 2100.

23 countries in the reference scenario, including Japan, Thailand, and Spain, were forecasted to have population declines greater than 50% from 2017 to 2100; China's population was forecasted to decline by 48·0% (−6·1 to 68·4). China was forecasted to become the largest economy by 2035 but in the reference scenario, the USA was forecasted to once again become the largest economy in 2098. Our alternative scenarios suggest that meeting the Sustainable Development Goals targets for education and contraceptive met need would result in a global population of 6·29 billion (4·82–8·73) in 2100 and a population of 6·88 billion (5·27–9·51) when assuming 99th percentile rates of change in these drivers.

snip
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hello "Children Of Men". ret5hd Jul 2020 #1
That's right rusty quoin Jul 2020 #22
This is a good problem to have. PTWB Jul 2020 #2
eh I don't think it's as good as you think qazplm135 Jul 2020 #11
We definitely need fewer people. PTWB Jul 2020 #13
I'm with you, too many people. Alex4Martinez Jul 2020 #16
not really qazplm135 Jul 2020 #24
It's easier to reduce our population than change our nature. PTWB Jul 2020 #31
But we aren't going to reduce our population from what it is now qazplm135 Jul 2020 #33
That isn't what the article says. PTWB Jul 2020 #35
to a number over a billion MORE qazplm135 Jul 2020 #37
The decline will continue. PTWB Jul 2020 #38
lol qazplm135 Jul 2020 #40
Agree completely!! Thekaspervote Jul 2020 #29
Oh, brother, that they have to suggest an existential problem out Hortensis Jul 2020 #58
Initially, that will be a problem, but once lower birth rates become the norm, things will smirkymonkey Jul 2020 #17
Your answer confirms that... HelpImSurrounded Jul 2020 #41
lol qazplm135 Jul 2020 #42
LOL some of us already working into our 60s-70s! Id be living on dogfood if I Kashkakat v.2.0 Jul 2020 #54
I wouldn't trust the forecasts of anyone marybourg Jul 2020 #3
Your are incorrect. Forecasted is commonly used (but not limited to) British English, and is also Celerity Jul 2020 #47
Yes, we will have to reorganize societies, and I don't think this is a bad thing. smirkymonkey Jul 2020 #4
You are so very wise :) nt mr_lebowski Jul 2020 #7
+1000 Thekaspervote Jul 2020 #30
Yeah greytdemocrat Jul 2020 #43
Who would be killed? smirkymonkey Jul 2020 #46
Everything you said on this thread CatLady78 Jul 2020 #51
Please name a socialist country that does not want growth. former9thward Jul 2020 #53
yes indeed. Voltaire2 Jul 2020 #57
I'd say it's the Aschen, but we didn't get the cool technology. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #5
There's nothing bad about this. NOTHING ... mr_lebowski Jul 2020 #6
unless you live in Nigeria, they're projected to have more people than the US and the EU combined do Celerity Jul 2020 #8
That sounds absolutely insane for a country of that size. Ace Rothstein Jul 2020 #14
Bangladesh is one sixth the size of Nigeria and has 165 million, Nigeria has 206 million now Celerity Jul 2020 #27
Bangladesh sounds like a hard pass from me. Ace Rothstein Jul 2020 #34
... Celerity Jul 2020 #36
if Bangladesh was the same size as Nigeria, with its current density, it'd have 1.03 billion people Celerity Jul 2020 #32
Either nature will take over (disease, global warming, which will cause starvation and death from smirkymonkey Jul 2020 #21
This isn't a problem. BGBD Jul 2020 #9
It's gonna drop faster than these forecasts. roamer65 Jul 2020 #10
Or a pandemic 10x more deadly than covid Wednesdays Jul 2020 #23
A decrease in litter size is normal in rat overpopulation experiments. aggression is increased too Baclava Jul 2020 #12
8.8 billion by 2100? In your dreams NickB79 Jul 2020 #15
There will be more automation in the future. The only reason they say it's negative JI7 Jul 2020 #18
Earth is also headed for "Jaw-Dropping" decline in habitable areas. PSPS Jul 2020 #19
Remember when SOYLENT GREEN suggested that our real problem was overpopulation? brooklynite Jul 2020 #20
They had a lot of extras for that movie. It was the last movie for Edward G. Robinson. rusty quoin Jul 2020 #25
"Who pays tax in a massively aged world? Who pays for healthcare for the elderly?" Mariana Jul 2020 #26
A peak population of 10 billion on an already severely stressed planet Crunchy Frog Jul 2020 #28
Yup.nt CatLady78 Jul 2020 #50
The Fascists will still keep having them though dustyscamp Jul 2020 #39
This pandemic that we're living through is only a preview of what will happen if we don't stop this. Initech Jul 2020 #44
This doesn't factor in medical advances meadowlander Jul 2020 #45
did you read the study (I provided the link to it in the OP)? Celerity Jul 2020 #49
This is a good thing-the planet is overburdened CatLady78 Jul 2020 #48
I already have enough stress worrying about the next 6 months. milestogo Jul 2020 #52
Call it Malthus' Revenge ucrdem Jul 2020 #55
Their figures can end up quite surprising muriel_volestrangler Jul 2020 #56
Idk, I think climate change will get in the way of this eventually Calculating Jul 2020 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Researchers Say Earth Is ...