Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: VT-GOV: Our Revolution endorses anti-vaxxer for Democratic nomination [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)40. BTW - The VICP was adopted in response to concerns over the pertussis portion of the DPT vaccine
So there's that.
Perhaps you aren't aware that pedicatricians screen children prior to giving them vaccines to determine if they are at risk for adverse reactions to any drug - family history and health, etc.
You sound rather doubtful that vaccines, like antibiotics, are indeed safely manufactured and should be part of the standard of care, because of the existence of the VICP, and "over a billion."
Maybe you can clarify?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
VT-GOV: Our Revolution endorses anti-vaxxer for Democratic nomination [View all]
RandySF
Jul 2020
OP
Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman, the son of a physician, is not an anti-vaxxer.
womanofthehills
Jul 2020
#11
WotH, he really IS. Many politicians fudge beliefs not considered widely respectable,
Hortensis
Jul 2020
#17
He's ahead in the polls. They *need* to back some winners to claim that their endorsement did it
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#42
I haven't seen an elected politician with a ponytail since Ben Nighthorse Campbell
Polybius
Jul 2020
#8
Perhaps because anti-vaxxers are a public health hazard? Especially during a pandemic...
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#36
Actually NO. Just a person who thinks people who are medically fragile should get an exemption
womanofthehills
Jul 2020
#13
Wrong. He's gone way farther than that - he has cast stated doubts on the science of vaccines
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#35
BTW - The VICP was adopted in response to concerns over the pertussis portion of the DPT vaccine
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#40
Actually YES - he has disputed the science, and the "motivations" of vaccine developers.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#34
It's not like Our Revolution hasn't jumped on the bandwagon to support a popular candidate,
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#37
+1000. I feel the very same about climate science skeptics, and anti-choice candidates.
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#45
If they disregard science and the mainstream medical community, of which Fauci is one,
ehrnst
Jul 2020
#33