Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(54,981 posts)
5. I was considering a "super majority" in terms of getting around a filibuster,
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 07:55 AM
Jul 2020

not overriding a veto. You may be correct.

Plus, a super majority isn't inviolate. Certain wavering Democrats can be persuaded through "incentives" or by threat to vote against their party and their constituencies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats need a Super-Ma...»Reply #5