Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
12. Without getting too wonkish, I'd tie the long-term capital gains tax rate to the Gini Coefficient.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 06:57 PM
Sep 2012

The Gini Coefficient (also called the Gini Index) is a measure of equitable distribution, usually used in relation to Income Distribution. It ranges from zero (0) to one (1.00) where zero is perfectly equal distribution and one is a distribution where a single person gets everything and everyone else gets nothing.

The Gini Coefficient of Income Distribution in the U.S. is currently around 0.47, which is the highest (most inequitable) it's been since we first gathered the data.

It seems to me that the income tax on realized long-term capital gains could be tied to the Gini Coefficient ... at, say. 0.10 less than the measure in the year preceding the tax year. Thus, those with the GREATEST incentive to ensure that we have equitable incomes in this country would be those with the most to lose in capital gains.

This might be a decent way to peg the corporate tax rate as well.



Needless to say, I'm a "systems wonk" ... and like feedback loops and self-correcting systems. I tend to look for ways to create gross incentivization mechanisms ... and tend to eschew the fad du jour.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If the rich wanted a lower tax rate, they would create those jobs for which they are called creators liberal N proud Sep 2012 #1
apply it to capital gains too tk2kewl Sep 2012 #2
Without getting too wonkish, I'd tie the long-term capital gains tax rate to the Gini Coefficient. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #12
very cool idea tk2kewl Sep 2012 #16
I like it. Scuba Sep 2012 #20
This is one of the greatest ideas I've heard in awhile. phleshdef Sep 2012 #3
That's brilliant jberryhill Sep 2012 #4
Love it ck4829 Sep 2012 #5
Yes! We need to incentivize those lazy 1%-ers! reformist2 Sep 2012 #6
K&R for this great idea! Cali_Democrat Sep 2012 #7
brilliant librechik Sep 2012 #8
this is actually a pretty good idea. Shows how stupid their argument is. n/t Hamlette Sep 2012 #9
What a great idea! HooptieWagon Sep 2012 #10
(Wow) It seemed like a good idea to me ... but I never know on DU. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #11
ooh, good idea. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #13
Not a bad idea on its face SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #14
I fail to see how any business would be "FORCED" to do anything in particular. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #17
Fair enough, let me rephrase SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #27
Ah! Let me be clear... EVERYONE would pay the same tax rates just as now. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #28
Got it, thanks for the clarification! n/t SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #29
I like it. 99Forever Sep 2012 #15
Good idea madokie Sep 2012 #18
(lol) What's happened to DU? TahitiNut Sep 2012 #19
I proposed this before. Ganja Ninja Sep 2012 #21
The proposal only requires that the methodology for determining the unemployment rate is CONSISTENT. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #24
The idea that tax cuts create jobs is a perfect.. sendero Sep 2012 #22
That's why I suggest that Jobs should create tax cuts ... legislatively. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #23
Yup that's the idea. Ganja Ninja Sep 2012 #26
brilliant mick063 Sep 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Job Creators,"...»Reply #12