Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Karma13612

(4,963 posts)
5. I'm curious how they came up with $600
Sat Jul 25, 2020, 07:33 AM
Jul 2020

Per week.

Is this what the check is, or are taxes taken out.

I ask because I recall my unemployment back a few years ago was about half that.

Do people need the money? Yes, of course. To pay for everything. I understand that. But, not everyone’s living expenses are the same.

As a retired person, living on SS alone, I am getting $1700 per month. My expenses are more than that per month. I guess I see a disconnect.

Yes, I got the $1200 for COVID relief. That’s apparently equal to two weeks of support to anyone who was working. My expenses have not changed from working in 2018 to now. But, my SS doesn’t meet what I was making before retirement. When I was working, up to retirement, my take home pay was $2600 per month.

Again, $600 per week to everyone that was working before COVID hit?
How did they arrive at this figure? How do they decide how much everyone gets if everyone’s expenses are different?

And since I was not employed at the time of the relief checks, why did I qualify for one?

No wonder some people don’t want to return to work. They are making more money by staying home as long as the benefits continue. And I DO understand that some jobs will not return. Those people should continue to receive support.


I know the flaming is going to start, but I’m not clear on any of this. It doesn’t seem equitable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Repigs don't care TEB Jul 2020 #1
Precisely Sherman A1 Jul 2020 #2
This! We're not facing the long-term consequences FakeNoose Jul 2020 #38
Stay home and not work?? Find Something Else! nt Shermann Jul 2020 #3
"Find something New!" calimary Jul 2020 #15
one of the ironies... handmade34 Jul 2020 #4
It's actually more than 600/week gab13by13 Jul 2020 #18
Yes, it is an add-on to the normal benefits...nt Wounded Bear Jul 2020 #24
yup... handmade34 Jul 2020 #25
Unemployment benefits are taxable. Igel Jul 2020 #34
It is not subject to payroll taxes MichMan Jul 2020 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jul 2020 #37
Handmade34, I see you posting against the $600 extra unemployment on a lot of these threads, BComplex Jul 2020 #42
I have never argued against the $600 handmade34 Jul 2020 #43
I'm curious how they came up with $600 Karma13612 Jul 2020 #5
The not returning to to work is GOP BS. Demsrule86 Jul 2020 #7
Actually, it's not BS... dixiechiken1 Jul 2020 #16
What kind of company rules do they have? gab13by13 Jul 2020 #20
You're right... dixiechiken1 Jul 2020 #23
It is bullshit. EarthFirst Jul 2020 #26
Minimum wage needs to be raised to $25 per hour now. MichMan Jul 2020 #28
One little problem with that. You can't refuse to go back to your job & still stay on unemployment Doremus Jul 2020 #41
Pretty nuch every word you said is a Gop talking point . Demsrule86 Jul 2020 #8
"As long as the benifits continue" is key. As long as they Luz Jul 2020 #9
Thank you for your honesty. nt Karma13612 Jul 2020 #13
It comes out to $15.00 an hour Generic Brad Jul 2020 #12
Makes sense. Thanks. nt Karma13612 Jul 2020 #14
It is added to regular unemployment and since there is no FICA and Medicare taxes, equates to $23/hr MichMan Jul 2020 #30
$600 is equal to being paid $15 an hour for a 40-hour work week. stopbush Jul 2020 #21
It's difficult and expensive to be "equitable" when one is in an emergency situation. stopbush Jul 2020 #27
Why is California so stingy ? MichMan Jul 2020 #31
That is an excellent question! stopbush Jul 2020 #33
$15./hour n/t handmade34 Jul 2020 #39
No it was part of a stimulus,us package and without it, our economy goes off a cliff, Demsrule86 Jul 2020 #6
Meatpackers are, uh, dying to hire brave workers, workers who are concerned progree Jul 2020 #10
People need to stay home MichMan Jul 2020 #11
If unemployment is an incentive to not return to work perhaps wages are too low. Wounded Bear Jul 2020 #17
I don't know of any companies gab13by13 Jul 2020 #22
So are you saying they should all be fired and kicked off from unemployment completely ? MichMan Jul 2020 #32
Except that some employers went on the record as having difficulties. Igel Jul 2020 #36
Yep. I have pointed that out before on DU, FB and elsewhere. stopbush Jul 2020 #19
It's a big deal to those working for less than the unemployment checks dickthegrouch Jul 2020 #44
I do to. Plus the jobs aren't there to fill. It isn't business as usual and can't be with Covid-19 Tom Rinaldo Jul 2020 #29
no, it was never to give an option / choice to stay home Amishman Jul 2020 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The $600 Was So You Could...»Reply #5