Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The big Headline - The Attorney General of the United States says he does not know if the [View all]IcyPeas
(25,184 posts)35. Swastikas Okay, BLM not okay.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The big Headline - The Attorney General of the United States says he does not know if the [View all]
malaise
Jul 2020
OP
👆 Any sitting US AG who claims not to know and understand that basic tenet of the Constitution
crickets
Jul 2020
#52
He's not ignorant; he knows very well what the law says about elections.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2020
#45
Oh.. sure!! Sorry I didn't pick up on that. The craziness of it all has my usual upbeat demeanor
Thekaspervote
Jul 2020
#44
Legitimate question. ...We know fat boy barr is playing to dotard but is this also scare tactics?
Thekaspervote
Jul 2020
#22
And yet Pramila Jayapal proved that FBI mail investigation showed .00006 percent fraud.
ancianita
Jul 2020
#46
I rank Jayapal and Deming the #1 questioners, with Jeffries and Swalwell tied for #2!
ancianita
Jul 2020
#49
Those look like two different problems. How does the first get influenced by the second?
ancianita
Jul 2020
#50
Right. SCOTUS upheld the constitutionality of faithless electors. So Trump can win with or without
ancianita
Jul 2020
#59
That's what I read, at least. I've yet to read a clear explanation of the ruling.
ancianita
Jul 2020
#66
That sounds on par with some of the other articles I've seen on the topic.
jorgevlorgan
Jul 2020
#68
Another thought is that if we get throgh this election, we will need to immediately do what
jorgevlorgan
Jul 2020
#69
Nevermind. I got the answer. He can cancel citizen votes and only take elector votes.
ancianita
Jul 2020
#51
