Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TlalocW

(15,674 posts)
37. Depends on what you think they're sub-categories of
Mon Aug 3, 2020, 11:20 AM
Aug 2020

They're not sub-categories of pedophilia if that's what you mean. Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Hebephile for adolescents who have just started puberty, generally 11 to 14-years-old, and ephebophile is for mid to late adolescents from 15 to 19-years-old. Pedophilia has just become a catch-all word for attraction to young kids, where young can mean various things depending on the person. I've even heard interesting discussions about how we don't control who or what we are attracted to, pedophiles who never act on their desires because they realize the other party would not be consenting adults and any relationship would be traumatic are to be admired, but the line there would be too thin for the general public.

And after saying all that, perhaps some of them are sub-categories. According to Wikipedia: Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

So amending what I was saying, Moore would want to fight to have himself classified as an ephebophile instead of a pedophile, assuming the trial was becoming a worst case scenario for him, since hebephile can overlap with pedophilia.

But then, I'm not any kind of mental health person, and I could be talking out my ass.

TlalocW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ha! Nevilledog Aug 2020 #1
Brilliant! Dem2theMax Aug 2020 #2
Second vote for Brilliant! lettucebe Aug 2020 #25
Cheers Lootsafe Aug 2020 #3
Excellent! 👏👏👏👏 SheltieLover Aug 2020 #4
The standard of proof in civil cases is merely preponderance of evidence. unblock Aug 2020 #5
But Cohen is the defendant Disaffected Aug 2020 #7
I mean compared to prosecuting Moore for pedophilia unblock Aug 2020 #10
What if more victims come forward? CaptYossarian Aug 2020 #13
The charge is defamation Disaffected Aug 2020 #14
Please read the post you replied to unblock Aug 2020 #15
The more salient point is Disaffected Aug 2020 #18
It's true that Moore doesn't have to prove defamation beyond a reasonable doubt unblock Aug 2020 #20
OK, however this case shakes out, Disaffected Aug 2020 #22
It will be fascinating unblock Aug 2020 #23
I wish I could rec a subthread. Lasher Aug 2020 #29
He doesn't have to prove defamation beyond a reasonable doubt, but this is a different question StarfishSaver Aug 2020 #33
Don't civil cases only require a majority of jurors to make a finding? Fiendish Thingy Aug 2020 #19
usually still unanimous unblock Aug 2020 #21
It depends on the jurisdiction StarfishSaver Aug 2020 #35
Even if they do talk to his victims TlalocW Aug 2020 #6
That's what I was thinking. nt tblue37 Aug 2020 #9
I don't know if they'll be smart enough to think of this TlalocW Aug 2020 #12
Not a lawyer, but it seems to me that common usage rather than dictionary definitions RockRaven Aug 2020 #11
Aren't those just subcategories? nt live love laugh Aug 2020 #30
Depends on what you think they're sub-categories of TlalocW Aug 2020 #37
It's not libel if it's true... Wounded Bear Aug 2020 #8
Such SLIME!!!!! MyOwnPeace Aug 2020 #16
"Judge" Roy Moore..... AZ8theist Aug 2020 #17
Self-hoisted by his own petard. Ouch. That's going to hurt. marble falls Aug 2020 #24
I remember that video. TexasTowelie Aug 2020 #26
There go da judge! nt Lord Ludd Aug 2020 #27
Great success! AdamGG Aug 2020 #28
Sweet! oasis Aug 2020 #31
Did a Judge The Wizard Aug 2020 #32
And to think the legal genius that is Roy Moore was a State Supreme Court Chief Justice. Pepsidog Aug 2020 #34
The Borat movie was the funniest thing I have ever seen! nt USALiberal Aug 2020 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Roy Moore Sued Sach...»Reply #37