Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marybourg

(13,643 posts)
14. No. And "entrapment" means inducing someone
Sun Aug 9, 2020, 03:15 PM
Aug 2020

to do something they wouldn’t have done otherwise. So his argument is that a package on a porch is an inducement to someone who wouldn’t have stolen the package if there hadn’t been a package. Not a real compelling argument.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What's unethical about it? LisaL Aug 2020 #1
I guess criminals and their lawyers will try ANY angle. NurseJackie Aug 2020 #16
CBS This Morning covered this... NurseJackie Aug 2020 #65
Mark Rober videos are funny. This is the second Porch Pirate Glitter/Stink Bomb video he made. TheBlackAdder Aug 2020 #64
Hell no! SheltieLover Aug 2020 #2
Absolutely not. silverweb Aug 2020 #3
No. It's unethical to be a porch pirate soothsayer Aug 2020 #4
That's a great idea and I'd fill the box with collected dog poop, too. Vinca Aug 2020 #5
There are some videos showing how the thieves look inside to see if it's WORTH stealing. NurseJackie Aug 2020 #17
No Tink41 Aug 2020 #6
Watch out for 'cat lady'. keithbvadu2 Aug 2020 #61
Hahhahah! Tink41 Aug 2020 #72
Sounds like an argument Alan Dershowitz would make ck4829 Aug 2020 #7
Only if they cause harm Blues Heron Aug 2020 #8
Wouldn't the stealing of the packages be what's unethical? brush Aug 2020 #9
Hell No! FoxNewsSucks Aug 2020 #10
Nopety nope! abqtommy Aug 2020 #11
I suppose any thief would think it's unethical. Throck Aug 2020 #12
Not at all. DonaldsRump Aug 2020 #13
No. And "entrapment" means inducing someone marybourg Aug 2020 #14
"But, Your Honor... if it hadn't been there, I wouldn't have been tempted!" NurseJackie Aug 2020 #18
Yep, that's what it comes down to. Of course -and I didn't read the article, but- marybourg Aug 2020 #19
Criminals will say anything. I saw another "Ring" video where the woman was caught... NurseJackie Aug 2020 #23
Here's the video I was referring to... go to the 3:30 time-mark NurseJackie Aug 2020 #54
As an attorney, that argument doesn't pass the laugh test. Ms. Toad Aug 2020 #26
Good lesson, thanks. :) Hortensis Aug 2020 #73
For the most part, funny though it may be, it is unethical and maybe illegal unblock Aug 2020 #15
Those calling it unethical are those nabbed by the police (and their lawyers) NurseJackie Aug 2020 #20
you are wrong in every way in this SiliconValley_Dem Aug 2020 #22
Nonsense - Ms. Toad Aug 2020 #27
I have no problem with the police doing this unblock Aug 2020 #33
The article was specific to police. Ms. Toad Aug 2020 #36
Well then I'm off-topic unblock Aug 2020 #41
Whatever. Fwiw, seems like filming thieves at work and Hortensis Aug 2020 #75
no and no qazplm135 Aug 2020 #29
There have been court cases about this unblock Aug 2020 #37
sigh...so as a criminal defense attorney qazplm135 Aug 2020 #40
Ok, how about a slap in the face? unblock Aug 2020 #43
Let's break that down qazplm135 Aug 2020 #52
notwithstanding your tone, we're mostly in agreement unblock Aug 2020 #59
no, we aren't qazplm135 Aug 2020 #60
It's no different than parking your car in your own driveway. yonder Aug 2020 #39
I didn't say it was entrapment unblock Aug 2020 #46
No, you did not - my mistake. yonder Aug 2020 #55
Stay out of *my* packages durablend Aug 2020 #44
The thief is doing something illegal, yes. That part is simple and obvious. unblock Aug 2020 #48
No. I can put a fake package on my porch. It is not illegal. nt gollygee Aug 2020 #47
If the package is intended to cause harm, then no unblock Aug 2020 #49
Glitter and stink bombs are not like an actual bomb. nt gollygee Aug 2020 #51
glitter and stink are not harm qazplm135 Aug 2020 #53
Glitter and stink bombs aren't designed to get your property back unblock Aug 2020 #70
the glitter and the stink ARE your property qazplm135 Aug 2020 #71
of course not. if they chose to come on your property and steal SiliconValley_Dem Aug 2020 #21
I agree. The claim that the GPS device is an invasion of the thief's privacy made me laugh! NurseJackie Aug 2020 #24
Agreed. There's no reasonable expectation of privacy when on someone else's property. unblock Aug 2020 #38
Only if it's unethical to put cheese on a moustrap Happy Hoosier Aug 2020 #25
The 'Porch Pirates' deserve a hell of a lot worse to be done to them and deserve no mercy. WyattKansas Aug 2020 #28
Invasion of a thief's privacy? That's hilarious lettucebe Aug 2020 #30
I welcome the porch pirates.... Xolodno Aug 2020 #31
When sellers and vendors use UPS or Fedex exclusively, then it's a hassle to ship to a PO Box... NurseJackie Aug 2020 #34
No mercy. DFW Aug 2020 #32
You've got my vote!! NurseJackie Aug 2020 #35
I recall someone making glitter-bomb packages with little cameras to watch. aikoaiko Aug 2020 #42
Yes, and then they moved up to adding a stink bomb - neither hurt the perpetrators csziggy Aug 2020 #62
Silly question! nt USALiberal Aug 2020 #45
I do not think it is unethical per se, and I have no problem LuckyCharms Aug 2020 #50
Glitter bomb fart spray VS porch Pirates jrandom421 Aug 2020 #56
There's also a "Glitter Bomb 2.0" (New and Improved) NurseJackie Aug 2020 #58
You have the right to place anything you want on your property... brooklynite Aug 2020 #57
Nope. ismnotwasm Aug 2020 #63
Nope. Not at all. smirkymonkey Aug 2020 #66
There's one at the grocery store I normally use. Is there a time-limit on how quickly... NurseJackie Aug 2020 #67
Yes, they usually give you a few days - 3 or 4, I think. smirkymonkey Aug 2020 #68
Awww poor misunderstood porch pirates. EllieBC Aug 2020 #69
No, porch pirates and thieves are scum. Devil Child Aug 2020 #74
Far from entrapment Polybius Aug 2020 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it unethical to use fa...»Reply #14