Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

artemisia1

(1,908 posts)
14. Try re-reading the post
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 12:02 AM
Aug 2020

The drinking age directly affected the safety and cost of the Federal highway system. It followed that states could (should) be required to clean up their acts in the area in which their behavior impacted Federal funds.

Masks or no masks do not directly, or indirectly, effect the Federal highway system so it "does not follow" (non-sequitur) to withhold HIGHWAY funds for such. Perhaps health funding which directly relates to it, perhaps yes. Understand now?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the early 80s, the Fed...»Reply #14