Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Denise21

(63 posts)
33. Mitt Romney's Son
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 12:45 PM
Sep 2012
Mitt Romney's Son
Signed 'Abortion' Clause
In Surrogate Birth Contract


EXCLUSIVE

TMZ has learned Mitt Romney's son Tagg -- who had twins this year through a surrogate -- signed an agreement that gave the surrogate, as well as Tagg and his wife, the right to abort the fetuses in non-life threatening situations ... and Mitt Romney covered some of the expenses connected with the arrangement ... and it may boil down to an incredibly stupid mistake.

The twin boys -- David Mitt and William Ryder -- were born on May 4, 2012. We've learned Tagg and his wife Jen, along with the surrogate and her husband, signed a Gestational Carrier Agreement dated July 28, 2011. Paragraph 13 of the agreement reads as follows:

"If in the opinion of the treating physician or her independent obstetrician there is potential physical harm to the surrogate, the decision to abort or not abort is to be made by the surrogate."

Translation: Tagg and Jen gave the surrogate the right to abort the fetuses even if her life wasn't in danger. All the surrogate has to show is "potential physical harm," which could be something like preeclampsia -- a type of high blood pressure that could damage the mother's liver, kidney or brain, but is not necessarily life-threatening.

Paragraph 13 goes on:

"In the event the child is determined to be physiologically, genetically or chromosomally abnormal, the decision to abort or not to abort is to be made by the intended parents. In such a case the surrogate agrees to abort, or not to abort, in accordance with the intended parents' decision."

And there's another relevant provision in Paragraph 13:

"Any decision to abort because of potential harm to the child, or to reduce the number of fetuses, is to be made by the intended parents."

Translation: Tagg and his wife, Jen, had the right to abort the fetuses if they felt they would not be healthy.

Sources connected with Mitt Romney tell TMZ, Mitt was involved in the surrogate arrangement because he paid some of the expenses connected with the agreement. We do not know if Mitt Romney read the contract or knew the terms.

Mitt has said, "I'm in favor of abortion being legal in the case of rape and incest and the health and life of the mother." Otherwise, Romney is against abortion.

Now for the stupid mistake. We've learned Tagg chose the same surrogate in 2009, who gave birth to a boy. Attorney Bill Handel -- a nationally-known expert in surrogacy law who put the deal together between Tagg and the surrogate -- tells TMZ when the 2009 contract was drafted there was no Paragraph 13 providing for abortion because Tagg and his wife didn't want it.

Handel says in 2011, when the second contract was being drafted, everyone involved "just forgot" to remove Paragraph 13. Handel says, "No one noticed. What can I say?".

Read more: http://www.tmz.com#ixzz277iOeEEP

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Still, Executive Rats are jumping the S.S. Willard as it drifts into the Iceberg of Reality Berlum Sep 2012 #1
Let me get this straight--THIS is the great business mind that is going to restore our economy. bklyncowgirl Sep 2012 #2
Like the other poster says, this is what they do before pulling the plug sammytko Sep 2012 #8
Well they're doing such a great job managing his campaign gollygee Sep 2012 #3
Yeah. Just like those well-compensated corporate CEOs... beac Sep 2012 #27
Maybe they are doing a great job. They don't have much to work with. n/t A Simple Game Sep 2012 #38
It's obvious they weren't based on performance. catbyte Sep 2012 #4
This is standard operating procedure. mattclearing Sep 2012 #5
I wonder if it's SOP in political campaigns Rose Siding Sep 2012 #6
Dunno, but I think the schedule/funding requirements of the primaries and the general election... mattclearing Sep 2012 #14
I don't believe it is. LiberalFighter Sep 2012 #36
He's running his campaign like he would a business Retrograde Sep 2012 #35
what if.... LittleRock Sep 2012 #7
That's how he's always done business. n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #9
Old habits die hard. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #10
In the end he'll have to file bankruptcy madokie Sep 2012 #11
what heaven05 Sep 2012 #25
His campaign madokie Sep 2012 #44
Silence is expensive malaise Sep 2012 #12
he doesnt want to be Prez, he's just running a con on donors NightWatcher Sep 2012 #13
I don't know if you're kidding or not, but I've believed this from the beginning.... cbdo2007 Sep 2012 #19
Why of course. Haven't they put on one hella campaign so far? sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #15
Hrm Xyzse Sep 2012 #16
This is why he's spending more time at fund-raisers than actually campaigning starroute Sep 2012 #17
Here are some links to support the "more time fundraising" thing starroute Sep 2012 #18
Newt was in the race for the money, so why not Romney. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2012 #30
Does it say how much is going into Mitt's bank account?? cbdo2007 Sep 2012 #20
That's Wall Street Culture Tom Rinaldo Sep 2012 #21
I view this as a desperate plea to keep them from jumping ship... 4_TN_TITANS Sep 2012 #22
Well, he and his buddies have to walk away with something.... Moonwalk Sep 2012 #23
So by the math PATRICK Sep 2012 #24
You know you are in trouble PATRICK Sep 2012 #26
With the campaign that Mitt is running he should have FIRED his staff LynneSin Sep 2012 #28
Tha's it .... We just need more Cowbell! :) beachgirl2365 Sep 2012 #29
It can not be denied DFW Sep 2012 #31
It's one way the 1% redistribute wealth--give it out as bonuses so the creditors can't get at it librechik Sep 2012 #32
Mitt Romney's Son Denise21 Sep 2012 #33
Buying chairs around the table DollarBillHines Sep 2012 #34
A $20 million loan from a community bank? DeSwiss Sep 2012 #37
why not? they've earned it! frylock Sep 2012 #39
What would the bonuses have been like if Mitt was ahead? jmowreader Sep 2012 #40
to keep the rats from jumping ship, i imagine spanone Sep 2012 #41
very. it's wall street's mo writ small. paying their top people more is deductible, & then they're HiPointDem Sep 2012 #42
Is there a way Romney can suck several million out of the campaign for himself, tclambert Sep 2012 #43
This is Bain way - redistribution of other people's money to those who don't deserve it. VPStoltz Sep 2012 #45
THAT'S THE WAY HE ROLLS Thomas Paine 2.0 Sep 2012 #46
Very true CJCRANE Sep 2012 #48
No surprises here - move along! rapersun Sep 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Familiar?: Mitt Hands Top...»Reply #33