Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Familiar?: Mitt Hands Top Staff Hefty Bonuses While Borrowing Millions [View all]Denise21
(63 posts)33. Mitt Romney's Son
Signed 'Abortion' Clause
In Surrogate Birth Contract
EXCLUSIVE
TMZ has learned Mitt Romney's son Tagg -- who had twins this year through a surrogate -- signed an agreement that gave the surrogate, as well as Tagg and his wife, the right to abort the fetuses in non-life threatening situations ... and Mitt Romney covered some of the expenses connected with the arrangement ... and it may boil down to an incredibly stupid mistake.
The twin boys -- David Mitt and William Ryder -- were born on May 4, 2012. We've learned Tagg and his wife Jen, along with the surrogate and her husband, signed a Gestational Carrier Agreement dated July 28, 2011. Paragraph 13 of the agreement reads as follows:
"If in the opinion of the treating physician or her independent obstetrician there is potential physical harm to the surrogate, the decision to abort or not abort is to be made by the surrogate."
Translation: Tagg and Jen gave the surrogate the right to abort the fetuses even if her life wasn't in danger. All the surrogate has to show is "potential physical harm," which could be something like preeclampsia -- a type of high blood pressure that could damage the mother's liver, kidney or brain, but is not necessarily life-threatening.
Paragraph 13 goes on:
"In the event the child is determined to be physiologically, genetically or chromosomally abnormal, the decision to abort or not to abort is to be made by the intended parents. In such a case the surrogate agrees to abort, or not to abort, in accordance with the intended parents' decision."
And there's another relevant provision in Paragraph 13:
"Any decision to abort because of potential harm to the child, or to reduce the number of fetuses, is to be made by the intended parents."
Translation: Tagg and his wife, Jen, had the right to abort the fetuses if they felt they would not be healthy.
Sources connected with Mitt Romney tell TMZ, Mitt was involved in the surrogate arrangement because he paid some of the expenses connected with the agreement. We do not know if Mitt Romney read the contract or knew the terms.
Mitt has said, "I'm in favor of abortion being legal in the case of rape and incest and the health and life of the mother." Otherwise, Romney is against abortion.
Now for the stupid mistake. We've learned Tagg chose the same surrogate in 2009, who gave birth to a boy. Attorney Bill Handel -- a nationally-known expert in surrogacy law who put the deal together between Tagg and the surrogate -- tells TMZ when the 2009 contract was drafted there was no Paragraph 13 providing for abortion because Tagg and his wife didn't want it.
Handel says in 2011, when the second contract was being drafted, everyone involved "just forgot" to remove Paragraph 13. Handel says, "No one noticed. What can I say?".
Read more: http://www.tmz.com#ixzz277iOeEEP
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Familiar?: Mitt Hands Top Staff Hefty Bonuses While Borrowing Millions [View all]
Rose Siding
Sep 2012
OP
Still, Executive Rats are jumping the S.S. Willard as it drifts into the Iceberg of Reality
Berlum
Sep 2012
#1
Let me get this straight--THIS is the great business mind that is going to restore our economy.
bklyncowgirl
Sep 2012
#2
Dunno, but I think the schedule/funding requirements of the primaries and the general election...
mattclearing
Sep 2012
#14
I don't know if you're kidding or not, but I've believed this from the beginning....
cbdo2007
Sep 2012
#19
This is why he's spending more time at fund-raisers than actually campaigning
starroute
Sep 2012
#17
It's one way the 1% redistribute wealth--give it out as bonuses so the creditors can't get at it
librechik
Sep 2012
#32
very. it's wall street's mo writ small. paying their top people more is deductible, & then they're
HiPointDem
Sep 2012
#42
Is there a way Romney can suck several million out of the campaign for himself,
tclambert
Sep 2012
#43
This is Bain way - redistribution of other people's money to those who don't deserve it.
VPStoltz
Sep 2012
#45