General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rep. Nancy Pelosi Promises To Overturn 'Citizens United' If We Give Her Back The House [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Very good, you did not write "Nancy Pelosi is a scheming, two-faced, moustache-twirling asshole." it is left to the reader to infer your intent from what you did write.
So clearly from what you wrote, you believe Nancy Pelosi is not to be trusted at her word on this citizens United thing. You seem to hold that it is some sort of scheme from her, an attempt to mislead or delude you. You offer no comprehensible reason for her to do this, other than she's Nancy Pelosi, I guess.
No, you didn't write "Nancy Pelosi is a scheming, two-faced, moustache-twirling asshole." But a competently literate person reading your posts understands that you think that Nancy Pelosi is concocting a duplicitous scheme, for no apparent or obvious reason other than perhaps a snidely Whiplash-like love of being an asshole.
Shame on you for trying this fucking sad defense, AnotherMcIntosh. Save it for the youtube comments section.
so now, back to the issue at hand; which is more likely, based on the logic of simplicity?
A) Nancy Pelosi is a scheming, two-faced, moustache-twirling asshole who likes leading you around for no damn good reason,
or
b) it was taken "off the table" due to not having a chance of actually getting passed?