Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jay Bazuzi

(2 posts)
35. Yes, our systems channel our behavior
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 02:01 PM
Sep 2012

You are correct to recognize the importance of our systems' effect on people's behavior. For example, Occupy Wall Street often objects to "greed", but greed is the only sane response to the system we have created.

Our beliefs are changing, and it's coming time to change our systems to match. However, it's important to remember that at one time, our beliefs and systems *did* match. For example. 80 years ago, a young person might be eager to develop new ways to clearcut forests faster, and be proud of his work. Today, ambitious young people want to restore ecosystems and study permaculture.

Charles Eisenstein's book _Sacred Economics_ describes some steps we can take to transform money and economics to match these changing beliefs. Other institutions, such as school, government, agriculture, and medicine will all need similar transformations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How does this differ from a typical commune? dkf Sep 2012 #1
And different states? tama Sep 2012 #2
Not a big believer in simple answers Confusious Sep 2012 #3
Heh tama Sep 2012 #5
I've never connected wisdom with simplicity Confusious Sep 2012 #10
Gift for? tama Sep 2012 #14
Gift economies Confusious Sep 2012 #16
That's not gift tama Sep 2012 #21
The article wasn't that enlightening Confusious Sep 2012 #26
Those are good questions tama Sep 2012 #31
He doesn't propose the abolition of money Jay Bazuzi Sep 2012 #34
5000 years tama Sep 2012 #6
500 years is recorded history Confusious Sep 2012 #13
"Staying the same" tama Sep 2012 #19
Certainly not a society based on oral knowledge. Confusious Sep 2012 #22
What I don't understand tama Sep 2012 #25
You made it sound like oral was superior Confusious Sep 2012 #27
Thank you for sharing your vision. tama Sep 2012 #32
New age tama Sep 2012 #7
knee jerk emoticon of ridicule of wide range of phenomena Confusious Sep 2012 #15
Whatever tama Sep 2012 #20
That's why we have programs to help with the basics Confusious Sep 2012 #24
No problem tama Sep 2012 #28
I'm all for new ideas Confusious Sep 2012 #29
A bit more tama Sep 2012 #33
Gift economy tama Sep 2012 #4
K/R marmar Sep 2012 #8
... xchrom Sep 2012 #9
Yes, I love Charles Eisenstein and simiilar visionaries. OneGrassRoot Sep 2012 #23
yes marmar yes otherone Sep 2012 #12
Radical gifting.. ananda Sep 2012 #11
This is nice-sounding drivel. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #17
The article isn't very enlightening Confusious Sep 2012 #18
Yes, our systems channel our behavior Jay Bazuzi Sep 2012 #35
It's all good fun until Boxer gets sent to the glue factory Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Totally Different Way t...»Reply #35